Comparative Effects of PIR Technique and Mulligan TSLR Technique alng with Retrowalking in Knee OA

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Knee Osteoarthritis.

• Registration Number: IRCT20230606058395N1
• Lead Sponsor: The University of Faisalabad

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 25 July 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 48

Inclusion Criteria

Knee pain with crepitus sound for 6 months or more
Both genders having age 40-60
Morning stiffness lasting <30 minutes
Bony tenderness with no palpable warmth
Tight Hamstrings muscles
Numeric Pain Rate Scale (NPRS) score of 5 or greater than 5
Radiographic finding Grade II-III according to Kellgren Lawrence Scale
Bilateral or Unilateral Involvement

Exclusion Criteria

Any history of trauma to the knee ligament or any neurological impairment
Any other pathology (e.g. fractures, bursitis, backache, radiating pain to the leg)
History of recent steroid injection since 3 months
Severe valgus or varus deformity
History of recent lower limb or spinal surgeries
Signs of active infection or inflammation to the knee joint
Participants who are unwilling to participate in study

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Knee Pain. Timepoint: Before intervention and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Numeric Pain Rate Scale.;Range of motion. Timepoint: Before intervention and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Universal Goniometer.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Functional Ability. Timepoint: Before intervention and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: WOMAC Questionnare.;Cadence. Timepoint: Before intervention and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Pedometer.