MedPath

Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain in Primary Healthcare

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Pain Management
Chronic Pain
Interventions
Other: Interdisciplinary care (control)
Other: Interdisciplinary care + booster session (intervention)
Registration Number
NCT06084390
Lead Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Brief Summary

Purpose: The overall aim is to investigate the effect of interdisciplinary rehabilitation in primary health care (PHC) for patients with chronic pain. Specific questions: What is the effect of extended access to the interdisciplinary PHC pain team + a booster session after finishing the rehabilitation program? Does participation in PHC interdisciplinary rehabilitation contribute to health improvements and are there predictors of this? Method: A randomized controlled trial (RCT). 200 patients with chronic pain that participate in interdisciplinary rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Region Västra Götaland (VGR) in Sweden will be included in the RCT and randomized to Intervention; standard care by the interdisciplinary teams in PHC + extended access to the team and a booster session 3 months after the end of the rehabilitation, or Control; only standard care by the interdisciplinary teams. Outcomes are health related quality of life, pain intensity and other health aspects.

Detailed Description

The participants will be randomly allocated to intervention or active control. All participants in both arms receive the standard care for interdisciplinary rehabilitation at any of the six PHC pain teams in VGR. The teams consist of a physician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and psychologist. All teams provide person-centred rehabilitation, aiming to increase physical activity and support behavioural changes, and to decrease symptoms and the impact of pain on the patients´ daily lives. The standard care interdisciplinary rehabilitation period contains both theoretical and practical components such as patient education, physical exercise and behavioural interventions. The sessions are mainly group-based. The duration of the rehabilitation period varies between 5 to 7 weeks + a follow-up visit after 3 months.

The participants in the intervention arm also receive an extra booster-session 3 months after the standard follow-up. At the booster-session, the participant´s individual rehabilitation plan is followed-up and adjusted. This extra period also includes extended access to the team, meaning that the participants have the possibility to contact the team and, if needed, have digital or telephone contact.

The participants complete a battery of questionaires included in the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation an also extra questionnaires provided to the participants through an electronic research form.

Data collection is made at baseline before starting the rehabilitation, directly after the 5 to 7 weeks rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months after baseline.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Persons participating in interdisciplinary team rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Severe psychiatric disease, language difficulties that makes it impossible to complete the questionnaires

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interdisciplinary rehabilitation (control)Interdisciplinary care (control)Standard care by the interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams in primary healthcare.
Interdisciplinary rehabilitation + booster-session (intervention)Interdisciplinary care + booster session (intervention)Standard care by the interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams in primary healthcare + extended access to the team and a booster visit after 3 months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Health related quality of lifeBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

Rand-36 (0-100, a higher score indicates better health-related quality of life)

Pain intensityBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

Assessed with visual analog scale and numeric rating scale (0-100 mm, higher is more severe pain)

Health related quality of life 2Baseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

EuroQol 5D-3L (0-100, a higher score indicates better health-related quality of life)

Health related quality of life 3Baseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

EuroQol-Visual analogue scale (0-100, a higher score indicates better health-related quality of life)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Self-efficacyBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The Pain self-efficacy questionnaire short-form (PSEQ_2) (0-12, a higher score means better self-efficacy)

Pain spreadBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The participants mark in boxes painful areas

Pain catastrophizingBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The pain catastrophizing scale (Total score 0-52, higher score is worse)

Health care useFrom 12 months before to 24 months after the rehabilitation period.

Health care visit statistics

Pain acceptanceBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ-8) (Total score 0-48, 2 subscales 0-24 p. Higher score means better pain acceptance)

Symptoms of stressBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The stress and crisis inventory (SCI-93) (0-140, a higher score means more stress) symptoms)

Physical activityBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The Godin questionnaire (hours of physical activity per week)

Self-rated functionBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The Functional rating index (0-100 %, higher percent is worse)

Work abilityBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

One question (number 7) from the Work ability index (0-10, higher score is better)

Sickness abscenceFrom 12 months before to 24 months after the rehabilitation period.

Sickness absence data

Anxiety and depressionBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The hospital anxiety and depression scale (2 subscales for symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 21, a higher value means a higher degree of anxiety or depression)

Life satisfactionBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The LiSat questionnaire (2 questions ranging 1-6, higher score is better life satisfaction)

Patients´ own impression of changeDirectly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

Patient global impression of change (1-7, lower score means more improvement)

FatigueBaseline, directly after the rehabilitation period and 6, 12 and 24 months from the end of the rehabilitation period.

The multidimensional fatigue inventory (5 subscales ranging from 4 -20, higher score means more fatigue)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Research and development primary health care Fyrbodal

🇸🇪

Vänersborg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath