PReclude Infection EVEnts With No Prophylaxis Transperineal Biopsy 2
- Conditions
- Infection
- Interventions
- Procedure: Transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsyProcedure: Transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsyDrug: Antibiotic (prophylaxis)
- Registration Number
- NCT04815876
- Lead Sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Brief Summary
Approximately one million transrectal prostate biopsies are performed annually in the U.S., and the risk of post- biopsy infection is increasing due to greater antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Preliminary data demonstrates that a transperineal MRI-targeted biopsy approach under local anesthesia compared to the standard practice transrectal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy has a much lower risk of infection, comparable pain/discomfort and may improve detection of prostate cancer.
This randomized controlled trial will be the first prospective study to evaluate in-office transperineal MRI targeted prostate biopsy.
The investigators hypothesize that a transperineal MRI-targeted biopsy approach under local anesthesia compared to the standard practice transrectal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy has a much lower risk of infection, comparable pain/discomfort and may improve detection of prostate cancer.
- Detailed Description
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in U.S. men. There are approximately 1 million prostate biopsy performed annually in the U.S. Almost all biopsies are performed as an office based procedure in under 15 minutes. The precision of biopsy has improved over the last decade with the introduction of MRI guidance/targeting of suspicious lesions within the prostate.
However, significant limitations remain with this approach, including a significantly increasing risk of post-biopsy infection. This arises because more than 97% of all prostate biopsy are performed via a transrectal approach that introduces rectal bacteria with each pass of the biopsy needle into the sterile urinary tract. The current risk of post-transrectal biopsy infection, even with antimicrobial prophylaxis, is high at approximately 7% overall with 3% (30,000 men) requiring hospitalization annually.
Transperineal biopsy is an alternate approach that eliminates the direct introduction of bacteria from the rectum to the prostate. This approach, which is perfomed without antimicrobial prophylaxis, instead passes the biopsy needle through the perineal skin and pelvic floor.
Transperineal biopsy has not been widely adopted for several reasons. Historically, it has been considered too painful for patients in the clinic and thus was traditionally performed under general anesthesia. The added time, inconvenience and cost has limited its national adoptance. Second, when transrectal biopsy was initially adopted over 40 years ago, antibiotic resistance of rectal flora was not a challenge.
Beyond the potential for in-office transperineal biopsy to significantly reduce or eliminate biopsy infections, transperineal biopsy may also improve cancer detection: studies of transperineal biopsy (performed under general anesthesia) demonstrate higher detection rates for prostate cancer, particularly for anterior zone tumors, compared to transrectal biopsy. This is notable, as anterior tumors are difficult to sample with transrectal. Anterior tumors are also twice as likely to occur in African American men. In fact, our research demonstrates that some of the outcomes disparities in African American men may stem from an underdiagnosis of anterior prostate cancers.
Although transrectal biopsy is used widely, it is associated with a significant and increasing risk of biopsy infections due to growing antibiotic resistance, highlighting the urgent need for a safer alternative approach to prostate biopsy. The study investigators have refined a transperineal approach under local anesthesia with MRI-targeting/guidance without the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. The investigators hypothesize that transperineal MRI targeted biopsy will: (1) largely eliminate post-biopsy infections and costly hospitalizations for urosepsis; (2) be performed in the office with similar discomfort and non-infectious complications compared to transrectal MRI targeted biopsy; and (3) have significantly better detection of prostate cancer.
This multi-center randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate in-office transperineal MRI targeted vs. transrectal MRI targeted biopsy, the current gold standard. This has transformative impact to change current standard of practice.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 1302
- Active surveillance cohort: History of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer, first diagnosed ≤24 months prior to date of planned confirmatory biopsy and diagnostic biopsy was preceded by a multiparametric MRI of the prostate
- Prior negative cohort: Clinical concern for the presence of prostate cancer as determined by the treating urologist and prior negative prostate biopsy performed ≤36 months prior to date of planned biopsy
- Willingness to sign informed consent and adhere to the study protocol
- Acute prostatitis within the last 6 months
- Current non-urologic bacterial infection requiring active treatment with antibiotics
- Unfit to undergo prostate biopsy under local anesthesia
- Prior definitive therapy for prostate cancer, such as radiation therapy or partial gland ablation
- Contraindication to prostate MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, chronic kidney disease)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Transperineal Transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy Patients will receive a transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Transrectal Transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy Patients will receive a transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Transrectal Antibiotic (prophylaxis) Patients will receive a transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in infection adverse events, as measured on TRUS-BxQ At initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy TRUS-BxQ is a validated biopsy questionnaire that measures adverse events that have occurred due to infection. Patient questionnaire consists of Yes/No questions about infection complications and duration of infection.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in patient-reported pain and discomfort, as measured on a 0-10 Likert scale Immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy Pain and discomfort will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no pain/discomfort and high scores indicate greater pain/discomfort.
Change in patient-reported anxiety, as measured on a 0-10 Likert scale Immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy Anxiety will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no anxiety and high scores indicate greater anxiety.
Detection of clinically significant disease as measured by Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2 7 days post-biopsy Gleason Grade Group is a prostate cancer grading system released by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). Grade Group 1 indicates Low/Very Low Risk, Grade Group 2 indicates Intermediate (Favorable) Risk, Grade Group 3 indicates Intermediate (Unfavorable) Risk, and Grade Groups 4 and 5 indicate High/Very High Risk.
Prostate cancer grade will be categorized into insignificant (Gleason Grade Group 1) and clinically significant (Grade Group ≥ 2).Change in adverse events, as measured on TRUS-BxQ At initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy TRUS-BxQ is a validated biopsy questionnaire that measures adverse events that have occurred, such as hospital re-admissions, aborted procedures due to discomfort, hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, and/or hematochezia. Patient questionnaire consists of Yes/No questions about general complications and duration of adverse events.
Trial Locations
- Locations (16)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Southern California
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Northwestern University
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Connecticut
🇺🇸Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Einstein Healthcare Network
🇺🇸Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States
Georgetown University
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
🇺🇸Brooklyn, New York, United States
University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Johns Hopkins University
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
NewYork-Presbyterian Queens
🇺🇸Flushing, New York, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of North Carolina
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
University of Michigan
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States