MedPath

Video Consultation in CPAP for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Interventions
Other: Video consultation
Registration Number
NCT04563169
Lead Sponsor
Rijnstate Hospital
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of video consultation versus face-to-face consultation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea on patients' CPAP use (minutes/per night), self-efficacy, risk outcomes, outcome expectancies, experiences with technology and, patients' and nurses' satisfaction.

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of video consultation versus face-to-face consultation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea on patients' CPAP use (minutes/per night), self-efficacy, risk outcomes, outcome expectancies, experiences with technology and, patients' and nurses' satisfaction.

This study is a non-blinded randomized controlled trial with an intervention group (video consultations) and a usual care group (face-to-face consultations), with assessements after 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 and 24 weeks.

Patients were recruited from a large teaching hospital (Rijnstate, hospital), and included from January 2, 2019 until June 26, 2019.In total, 140 patients were randomized, (1:1 allocation).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
140
Inclusion Criteria
  • Older than 18 years
  • Diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea
  • AHI > 15
  • Requiring CPAP treatment
  • No history of CPAP treatment
  • Having access to a tablet or smartphone
  • Proficiency of the Dutch language
Exclusion Criteria
  • Psychiatric or cognitive disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Video consultationVideo consultationPatients in the video consultation group will receive video consultations.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
CPAP useWeek 4 through week 12

Continuous Airway Pressure use (minutes/night), extracted from Encore Anywhere.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Outcome expectanciesWeek 4

Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).

Risk perceptionWeek 4

Assessed with Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (very low) to 4 (very high).

CPAP adherenceWeek 4 through week 24

CPAP use for at least 5 nights per week for at least 4 hours per night. Extracted from Encore Anywhere.

Self-efficacyWeek 4

Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).

Satisfaction patientsAfter intervention completion, up to 8 months (after start).

Satisfaction with video consultation, benefits (eg, time and efficiency) and integration in work process. Items were rated on a 5 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale varying from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Suggestions for improvement were assessed using an open question

Expectations with video consultationBaseline

Questions based on constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Items were rated on a 7 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).

Experiences video consultationWeek 4

Questions based on constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (intervention group only). Items were rated on a 7 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rijnstate

🇳🇱

Arnhem, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath