MedPath

Clinical Utility of VI-RADS in Diagnosis of MIBC

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Multiparametric MRI
Radical Cystectomy
Vesical Imaging Report and Data System
Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma
Registration Number
NCT05097404
Lead Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Brief Summary

Bladder Cancer (BCa) is the 9th most common cancer worldwide. In general, BCa is presented as a non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in 70% of patients and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT). However, in cases of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), radical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard of treatment. Therefore, It is important to distinguish MIBC from NMIBC.

To date, pathologic staging is based on the result of TUR-BT before RC. However, it is operator dependent, thus residual cancer may be remained depending on surgical experience. Therefore, about 7%-30% patients of MIBC can be underestimated with NMIBC, and it can be increased to 45% if the muscle is not resected. Consequently, it has been raised the need for imaging test to overcome diagnostic limitations.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been widely used in the field of diagnosis of BCa. In 2018, the Vesical Imaging Report and Data System (VI-RADS) was published using T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, and 5-point VI-RADS scoring system has been proposed and reported as an imaging test useful for assessing muscle involvement in primary bladder cancer Therefore, in this study, we investigate the diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS scoring system that can differentiate NMIBC from MIBC in primary bladder cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
73
Inclusion Criteria
  • older than 18 years
  • primary bladder cancer in cystoscopy
  • suitable for MRI and TUR-BT
  • agreement to participate in the study and signing of an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • history of TUR-BT
  • previous radiation and/or chemotherapy for bladder cancer
  • Not suitable for MRI or TUR-BT

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
diagnostic accuracy of VI-RADS scoring system in diagnosis of MIBCFrom Sep 2021 to Sep 2024

diagnostic accuracy of VI-RADS scoring system in diagnosis of MIBC

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
clinical utility of VI-RADS to predict adverse pathology after repeat TUR-BT in high risk NMIBCFrom Sep 2021 to Sep 2024

clinical utility of VI-RADS to predict MIBC after repeat TUR-BT in high risk NMIBC (To predict the chance of MIBC after repeat TUR-BC according to VI-RADS score in patients with high risk MNIBC)

clinical utility of VI-RADS to reduce unnecessary repeat TUR-BT in high risk NMIBCFrom Sep 2021 to Sep 2024

clinical utility of VI-RADS to reduce unnecessary repeat TUR-BT in high risk NMIBC (To predict the chance of NMIBC after repeat TUR-BC according to VI-RADS score in patients with high risk MNIBC)

Prediction of MIBC according to the VI-RADS scoring systemFrom Sep 2021 to Sep 2024

Prediction of MIBC according to the VI-RADS scoring system

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Samsung Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath