Comparison of breathing/respiratory rates obtained from Raybaby and GE B30 patient monitor among adults in the ICU

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: NIL, This is an observational study for comparing breathing rates from two devices and soes not involve an intervention.

• Registration Number: CTRI/2020/06/025886
• Lead Sponsor: RIoT Solutions Inc

Brief Summary

This is an observational study to evaluate the effectiveness of Raybaby breathing monitor with respect to a medically certified device to assess the suitability of Raybaby non contact breath monitoring technique for clinical use. The study is yet to begin and publication would be drafted at the end of the study to establish correlation with medical standards and relevance.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-06-15
• Last Update Posted: 2020-12-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

General ICU patients.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient with known lung issues.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To check the agreement between the respiratory rates between the GE B30 and raybaby among adults, aging between 18 to 80 in the intensive care unit.	Respiratory rates (parameter of evaluation) from both devices will be compared at time intervals from 5 seconds or more and will be assessed post completion of monitoring of respective patients, starting from a minimum of 4 hour. Observations will be compiled every 2 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To obtain usable respiration data with an average of 20% conversion rate from 4 to 10 hours of monitoring patients at periodic intervals of 5 minutes.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

HCG Cancer Hospital; 🇮🇳 Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

HCG Cancer Hospital

🇮🇳Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

Dr Vijay Raju Krupesh

Principal investigator

9741777665

dr.krupesh@hcgel.com