Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02823119
NCT02823119UnknownPhase 2

Mini-hysteroscopy Versus Conventional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: August 2016Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intensity of pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hysteroscope diameter on the pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing diagnostic office hysteroscopy.

Detailed Description

The results of the studies comparing the pain experienced by the patients undergoing conventional office hysteroscopy or mini-hysteroscopy were mixed. Several studies revealed that mini-hysteroscopy significantly reduced the procedure related pain and other studies revealed that the use of mini-hysteroscope was not associated with significant reduction in the procedure related pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hysteroscope diameter on the pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing diagnostic office hysteroscopy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Nulliparous patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • Parous patients, menopausal status, cervical pathology, and previous cervical surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intensity of pain

Time Frame: up to 30 minutes

Intensity of pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)"

Secondary Outcomes

  • Duration of procedure(intraoperative)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Usama M Fouda

M.D, PhD

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials