Mini-hysteroscopy Versus Conventional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Patients Undergoing Office Hysteroscopy
- Conditions
- Pain
- Interventions
- Device: Mini-hysteroscopyDevice: Conventional Office Hysteroscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT02823119
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hysteroscope diameter on the pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing diagnostic office hysteroscopy.
- Detailed Description
The results of the studies comparing the pain experienced by the patients undergoing conventional office hysteroscopy or mini-hysteroscopy were mixed. Several studies revealed that mini-hysteroscopy significantly reduced the procedure related pain and other studies revealed that the use of mini-hysteroscope was not associated with significant reduction in the procedure related pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hysteroscope diameter on the pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing diagnostic office hysteroscopy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Nulliparous patients
- Parous patients, menopausal status, cervical pathology, and previous cervical surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mini-hysteroscopy Mini-hysteroscopy A rigid 2.7-mm hysteroscope with a 30° forward oblique lens and an outer sheath diameter of 3.3 mm. Conventional Office Hysteroscopy Conventional Office Hysteroscopy A rigid 2.9-mm hysteroscope with a 30° forward oblique lens and an outer sheath diameter of 5 mm
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intensity of pain up to 30 minutes Intensity of pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)"
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of procedure intraoperative
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department,Cairo university
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt