Providing Visual Feedback of Quality of CPR During Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Does Point of View Matter?
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 125
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Proportion of healthcare providers who are accurate in their visual assessment of CPR quality.
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators will look at how accurate pediatric healthcare workers are at judging quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, by observation of the chest compressions, and if they are more accurate at a certain position near the patient. The investigators will do this by having participants fill out a survey about the quality of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in several recorded resuscitation scenarios.
详细描述
Pediatric cardiac arrest leads to significant productive years lost, and has a huge emotional impact on families and caregivers. High quality CPR is the most important predictor for outcome in cardiac arrest. Human visual observation is commonly used and important to evaluate CPR quality. Interestingly, the accuracy of healthcare providers' visual assessment of CPR quality is unknown.
Primary Objective: To determine the accuracy of visual CPR assessment. Secondary Objective: 1) To identify the optimal position relative to the patient for accurate CPR assessment. 2) To determine health care practitioners' accuracy in identifying CPR errors.
Methods: We will videotape both good quality CPR and poor quality CPR in a simulated resuscitation. We will record 4 videos, one depicting high quality CPR, and 3 depicting the most common mistakes made when performing chest compressions, and these will be videotaped from the foot, head and side of the patient. Pediatric acute care professionals will be recruited to watch a randomized set of all 12 video clips, and fill out a brief and simple questionnaire on their assessment of the quality of the CPR being performed.
To assess the accuracy of the CPR quality, quantitative data on the quality of the CPR being performed during each of the 4 videotaped events will be captured and confirmed using a Laerdal CPRcard© (depth and rate) and the paediatric simulator SimJr© (recoil).
Operative definitions:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Pediatric acute care healthcare providers: such as nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory therapists, physicians, residents, fellows
- •Those who work in ER or ICU setting regularly or rotate through this setting
- •Basic Life Support (BLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certification within the past two years
排除标准
- •Anyone who has participated previously in the study
结局指标
主要结局
Proportion of healthcare providers who are accurate in their visual assessment of CPR quality.
时间窗: Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after it is collected.
次要结局
- Proportion of healthcare practitioners accurately identifying CPR errors (rate, depth, recoil).(Data is anticipated to be presented about 4 months after it is collected.)
- Proportion of healthcare practitioners who accurately report CPR quality from position in relation to the patient (head, side and foot of bed).(Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after data is collected.)
研究者
Nicola Robertson
KidSim Aspire Coordinator
KidSIM Simulation Program