COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE USG AIRWAY ASSESSMENT AND CORMACK LEHANE GRADING OF LARYNGOSCOPY AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN ADULT PATIENTS
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/11/059773
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr.Ashok kulasekar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA GRADE 1 AND 2.
AGE 18 TO 60 YEARS.
BOTH GENDER
ELECTIVE AND EMERGENCY SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA
Exclusion Criteria
PATIENTS WHO REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY
PATIENTS WITH ANY FEATURE OF DIFFICULT AIRWAY SUCH AS MAXILLOFACIAL ANOMALIES
RESTRICTED NECK MOVEMENTS,
PREGNANT WOMEN,
PATIENTS WITH AIRWAY PATHOLOGY, CERVICAL SPINE INJURY,
BMI >40
MOUTH OPENING <3
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To correlate ultrasound measurements of airway parameters such as <br/ ><br> 1.Volume of the tongue, <br/ ><br>2. Anterior soft tissue skin thickness at vocal cord and thyrohyoid level , <br/ ><br>3.Hyo mento distance ratio <br/ ><br>with Cormack lehane grading under direct laryngoscopyTimepoint: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of unanticipated difficult laryngoscopic view of Cormack lehane grading <br/ ><br>Timepoint: time points 3 weeks <br/ ><br>and 4 weeks