Probing the Efficacy of V5/MT Stimulation on Reading and Reading-related Measures in Children and Adolescents With Developmental Dyslexia

Over the last few decades, a huge number of studies has revealed that Developmental Dyslexia (DD), a brain-based neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a severe and persistent impairment in the acquisition of reading skills may depend on multiple neurocognitive impairments, ranging from language-specific to cognitive-general deficits. Besides the most influential hypothesis of a phonological core deficit, there is also evidence for difficulties in low-level visual-temporal information processing, as the magnocellular deficit theory supports, as well as for visual-spatial attentional deficits, visual-perceptual impairments, and rapid automatized naming (RAN)-speed deficits.

Replicated structural/functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated a DD hypoactivation relative to typical readers in the left temporo-occipital regions-critical for the automatic visual processing of word strings or print-and in the left temporo-parietal regions-important for grapheme-to-phoneme mapping.

Moreover, findings from animal models and post mortem studies in humans suggest that DD might also be associated with structural alterations in subcortical sensory pathways, particularly in visual and auditory thalamic nuclei and in their connections with high-order sensory cortices (i.e., the left hemispheric direct Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN)-V5/MT pathway and the left hemispheric direct Medial Geniculate Body (MGB)-mPT pathway). In addition, in adults with DD, left V5/MT-LGN connectivity strength correlated with RAN abilities - a key deficit in DD.

A number of studies have demonstrated the positive effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation used for transiently modifying neural activity of target areas, on reading and, particularly, in DD.

However, the few non-invasive brain stimulation studies on improving reading in DD yielded heterogeneous results and this variability might be partly due to the lack of neurobiological understanding of the underlying DD mechanism or to the use of traditional tDCS rather than a more focal technique such as the high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS).