Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/04/065947
CTRI/2024/04/065947Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

A comparison of Ultrasonography guided Axillary nerve block Versus Combined Peripheral nerve stimulator and Ultrasonography guided Axillary nerve block in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries.

Padala Sri sai Kamala Harika1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentStarted: January 6, 2024Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Latency by Modified Lovett Muscle Power Scale and Numerical Rating Scale for pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation of evoked motor responses has been called into doubt because ultrasonography is now frequently used to localise nerves during peripheral nerve blocking. Nerve stimulation’s function has evolved from that of a method for locating nerves to that of an addition to ultrasonography. When using ultrasound guided procedures, nerve stimulation may be effective as a safeguard against needle-nerve contact and as a means of avoiding nerves that are in the needle’s trajectory. When the position or appearance of the nerves may be varied, nerve stimulation is also a helpful adjunct in training amateurs in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.

Hence for surgeries involving elbow and forearm both USG and pns vs only USG guided Axillary nerve block is given.

And the efficacy of the block is assessed in the terms of time taken to perform the block, occurrence of LAST, Intraneural injections, onset of sensory and motor blockade in both procedures which is assessed by NRS SCALE and LOWETT muscle power scale.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Computer generated randomization
Masking
Participant Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
15.00 Year(s) to 55.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA GRADE 1&2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • No consent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Latency by Modified Lovett Muscle Power Scale and Numerical Rating Scale for pain

Time Frame: 0mins | 1min | 2mins | 3mins | 5mins | 7mins | 10mins

Secondary Outcomes

  • Need for supplementary analgesic agent by using Numerical Rating Scale for pain(0min)

Investigators

Sponsor
Padala Sri sai Kamala Harika
Sponsor Class
Other [self]

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials