跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06297109
NCT06297109进行中(未招募)不适用

Maxillary Patient Specific Implants in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Quality Assessment by Novel Automated Virtual Methods

Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2023年9月12日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
The stability of the upper airway

研究概览

简要总结

Orthognathic surgery is a type of jaw surgery where a surgeon cuts the bones of the upper and lower jaw and places them better. There are two ways they can put the bones in the correct place and keep them in place after the surgery. One way, called the "conventional method", is to use a 3D-printed guide called a splint to set the bones in the right place and then screw the bones together using metal plates that the surgeon bends into shape to fit during the surgery. Another way is to use a patient-specific implants (PSI) that has been 3D-printed in titanium beforehand that because of its unique shape both places and keeps all the bones in the correct place after they are screwed in. Both ways of doing it are golden standards, meaning they are already approved.

Measuring the accuracy of the surgery is done by comparing the positions of the bones after the surgery with the intended positions of those bones, according to the surgical plan. The closer the achieved position of each bone is to the intended position, the more accurate the result.

Measuring the stability of the surgery is done by comparing the positions of the bones after the surgery with the positions of the bones two years later. The less the position is changed, the more stable the result.

The goal of this clinical trial is to see how accurate and stable PSIs are in orthognathic surgery when the maxilla is split in 3 pieces, and to compare them with the conventional method in patients with overjet or overbite. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using PSIs provide accurate movements of the maxilla pieces?
  • Does using PSIs provide more accurate movements of the maxilla pieces than the conventional method?
  • Does using PSIs provide stable movements of the maxilla pieces after 2 years?
  • Does using PSIs provide more stable movements of the maxilla pieces than the conventional method?

Participants will get orthognathic surgery as part of their normal orthodontic treatment.

Investigators will compare the PSI and conventional groups to see if the PSIs are more accurate than the conventional method.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

盲法说明

The care provider and the investigator are blinded up to the selection of the device used for the surgery, as blinding is no longer possible from this state.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Mandibular retrognathia
  • Occlusion class II
  • Three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, as part of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with or without genioplasty

排除标准

  • Cleft lip
  • Craniofacial syndromes
  • Former trauma
  • Obstructive sleep apnea

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention

Experimental

Participants treated with patient-specific implants for Le Fort I osteotomy and genioplasty in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

干预措施: Patient-specific implants (Device)

Control

Active Comparator

Participants treated with conventional mini-plates for Le Fort I osteotomy and genioplasty in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

干预措施: Conventional mini-plates (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

The stability of the upper airway

时间窗: Two years postoperative

The stability of the upper airway space is measured as voluminal and cross-sectional area differences between the short- and long-term postoperative airway in mm3 and mm2, respectively. Measurements are performed on two weeks and two years postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans using the Mimics Innovation Suite software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium).

The accuracy of segmental Le Fort I bone movements

时间窗: Two weeks postoperative

The three-dimensional linear and angular accuracy are measured as differences between the planned and postoperative positions of all repositioned bone segments. Measurements are performed on pre- and two weeks postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans using the Mimics Innovation Suite software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). An error measure above 2 mm and/or 4 degrees is categorized as inaccurate.

The stability of segmental Le Fort I bone movements

时间窗: Two years postoperative

The three-dimensional linear and angular stability are measured as differences between the short- and long-term postoperative positions of all repositioned bone segments. Measurements are performed on two weeks and two years postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans using the Mimics Innovation Suite software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). An error measure above 2 mm and/or 4 degrees is categorized as unstable.

次要结局

  • The STOP-BANG - Snorting, Tiredness, Observed apnea, blood Pressure, BMI, Age, Neck circumference, Gender questionnaire(Preoperative and two years postoperative)
  • The Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire(Preoperative and two years postoperative)
  • The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale(Preoperative and two years postoperative)
  • The occlusion including horizontal/vertical overlap(Preoperative, two weeks postoperative and two years postoperative)
  • The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Symptom questionnaire(Preoperative and two years postoperative)

研究者

发起方
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验