Effects of Real-Time Feedback Assisted Self-Correction on the Posture of Scoliotic Patients
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Scoliosis
- Registration Number
- NCT03978273
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Brief Summary
Scoliosis is a progressive three-dimensional deformation of the spine during growth, with a prevalence of 80% in girls.
The treatments currently used are surgery and rigid brace, which aim to stabilize scoliosis evolution. The place of rehabilitation is disputed because the methods are multiple, non-standardized and the sessions are infrequent.
In a previous study (MOUVSCO, NTC02134704), researchers have identified systematic postural abnormalities in patients with scoliosis, and developped a virtual-brace (medical device, MD) to allow real-time self-correction of the trunk position.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate for the first time the efficacy of the virtual-brace on the correction of the posture of scoliotic patients.
The hypothesis is that intensified rehabilitation with the virtual-brace will improve pathological postures related to scoliosis.
- Detailed Description
The present study is the first evaluation of the efficacy of the virtual-brace on scoliotic patients.
The efficacy of rehabilitation will be estimate on the correction of the posture of scoliosis patients over 6 months by comparing 2 groups: a control group of patients conventionally treated with a night-time brace (G0 group_conventional) and an experimental group of patients wearing a night-time brace, doing postural rehabilitation exercises with the virtual brace and follow-up visits with a physiotherapist (G1 group_virtual-brace).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
- Patients with idiopathic scoliosis (left lumbar or right thoracic),
- Patients with moderate scoliosis: Cobb angle assessed on the last radiography between 20 ° and 35 °,
- Patients requiring the wearing of a rigid night-time brace,
- Patients having a home computer,
- Patients affiliated to social security or similarly regime,
- Patients who gave their consent to participate in the study,
- Patients whose 2 parents have signed the informed consent
- Patients with an unstabilized medical problem,
- Patients with known allergy to elastane,
- Patients with sensitivity to dizziness,
- Patients with pacemaker,
- Patients with implanted cardiac defibrillator,
- Patients with cochlear implant,
- Patients carrying a non-removable metal element,
- Protected patient concerned by articles L1121-5 and L1121-6 of the Public Health Code,
- Patients whose parents are protected by article L1121-8 of the Public Health Code
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Medio-lateral displacement during lateral inclination of scoliosis patients in the group with rehabilitation enriched by the virtual brace (group G1) compared with the reference treatment (group G0) at D180. 6 months Difference between D180 and D0 of the medio-lateral displacement of the pressure center during the lateral inclination in both groups G0 and G1. This parameter is evaluated during the conventional 3D motion capture analysis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quantification of the quality of life evaluated with the Scoliosis Research Society Patient questionnaire (SRS-22), for both groups G0 and G1. 6 months Difference in the result of the SRS-22 questionnaire between D180 and D0. SRS-22 is a self-reported questionnaire assessing self-image, function, pain, mental health, and satisfaction with care with score range from 1 to 5 (1=worst and 5= best) for each 22 questions. The global score is the mean score of all questions.
Quantification of kinematic feedback provided by the virtual-brace and their deviation from the prescription (only for group G1) 6 months Time course of the angular data of the trunk relative to the pelvis provided by the virtual brace, versus the prescribed exercises (evaluated every 3 weeks during the visit to the physiotherapist)
Treatment compliance for the rigid-brace (for both group G1 and G0) 6 months Compliance with the wearing of the rigid brace reported in the patient follow-up logbook.
Quantification of kinematic, postural and electromyographic anomalies during trunk tilting and rotation (for both groups G0 and G1). 6 months Conventional 3D motion capture analysis with surface ElectroMyoGram (EMG) pattern's at D0, D90 and D180.
Exploratory Objective : Descriptive analysis by group of all parameters related to postural disorders recorded during Conventional 3D motion capture analysis with EMG, EEG. 6 months Set of variables related to the severity of the postural disorder.
Treatment compliance for the virtual-brace (only for group G1) 6 months Only for group G1 : effective rehabilitation time collected from the virtual brace's log files.
Quantification of electroencephalogram (EEG) modifications during postural and walk initiation tasks (for both groups G0 and G1). 6 months Conventional 3D motion capture analysis with EEG records at D0, D90 and D180.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital Grenoble
🇫🇷Grenoble, France
University Hospital Grenoble🇫🇷Grenoble, FranceAurelien COURVOISIER, MD, PhDContactEchipon@chu-grenoble.frJacques GRIFFET, MD, PhDSub InvestigatorVeronique BOURG-ROSTAING, MDSub Investigator