NCT01924975
Completed
Not Applicable
Ultrasound-image Guided Versus Traditional Landmark Technique for Saphenous Vein Cannulation in Infants and Small Children
Satoshi Hanada1 site in 1 country102 target enrollmentJuly 2013
ConditionsSaphenous Vein Cannulation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Saphenous Vein Cannulation
- Sponsor
- Satoshi Hanada
- Enrollment
- 102
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Percentage of Participants With First Attempt Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the two different saphenous vein cannulation techniques; real-time ultrasound image-guided technique (Ultrasound group) vs. traditional landmark technique (Landmark group).
Investigators
Satoshi Hanada
Clinical Assistant Professor
University of Iowa
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Pediatric patient undergoing scheduled surgery which requires venous cannulation.
- •Term neonates and children \< 4 years old weighing \>/= 3 kg
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient with visible saphenous vein
- •Patient with no detectable saphenous vein under ultrasound
- •Patient with a skin wound or infection around puncture site
- •Patient with recent venous puncture at the puncture site (less than 1 month)
- •Patient with thrombus in saphenous vein or hematoma formation around the vein detected by ultrasound.
- •Patient with any emergency surgery
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Percentage of Participants With First Attempt Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes
- Percentage of Participants With Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation Within 3 Attempts of Needle Insertion, or a 10 Minute Time Period.(10 minutes)
- Time Required for Overall Successful Venous Cannulation.(10 minutes)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Subclavian Venous Catheterizations in Adult Patients Undergoing Major SurgeriesCompare Central Line Insertion of Subclavian Vein With Two Different Approaches Using UltrasoundNCT02925715Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh96
Completed
Not Applicable
Conventional vs Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation.Disorder of Cardiac FunctionNCT01690416Aarhus University Hospital Skejby40
Completed
Not Applicable
Better Arterial Cannulation Technique With Different HemodynamicsAcute Respiratory FailureShockNCT02825615Sultan Qaboos University100
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port ImplantationVascular Surgical ProceduresNCT01584193University of Lausanne Hospitals
Completed
Phase 3
Conventional Verses Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation, With and Without Local AnesthesiaHeart DiseaseNCT01561196Marlene A Hansen, Stud.med20