CTRI/2025/06/088133尚未招募2 期
Comparison of early outcomes of interrupted double X suture versus continuous far near-near far method for closure of abdominal wall incisions: A double blinded randomised control trial
All India Institute of Medical SciencesNew Delhi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 220 人开始时间: 2025年6月23日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 220
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the incidence of burst abdomen following interrupted double ‘X’ suture vs Smead Jones far near - near far continuous method
研究概览
简要总结
Double X interrupted suture technique of abdominal wall closure will result in significant reduction in the incidence of burst abdomen, surgical site infection and incisional hernia as compared to continuous closure technique for abdominal wall incisions more than five centimeters (cm) in length.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Open Label
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Age > 18 years Midline/ non midline incisions ( midline, paramedian, right subcostal, lumbar, pfannensteil ) > five cms in length Elective / Emergency procedures.
排除标准
- •Age < 18 years Patients undergoing re-laparotomy Patients who underwent previous hernia repair Patients with incisional hernia Patients with documented collagen vascular diseases Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy where fascial closure is not possible and requires a mesh laparostomy Pregnancy Patients unfit for general anaesthseia Refusal for consent.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the incidence of burst abdomen following interrupted double ‘X’ suture vs Smead Jones far near - near far continuous method
时间窗: At time of surgery | 1 week | 1 month | 3 month | 6 month
To compare surgical site infection following interrupted double ‘X’ suture vs Smead Jones far near - near far continuous method
时间窗: At time of surgery | 1 week | 1 month | 3 month | 6 month
次要结局
- To compare the incidence of incisional hernia at the end of six months follow up between interrupted double ‘X’ suture vs Smead Jones far near - near far continuous method(To compare postoperative wound pain between interrupted double ‘X’ suture and Smead Jones far near - near far continuous method at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months using Visual Analog Scoring system of pain)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Study for comparison of two types of suturing of abdominal wall muscle sheath in closing after emergency surgery for intestinal perforationPerforation of intestine (nontraumatic),CTRI/2019/02/017688Dean Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital100
已完成
不适用
Two-stage ORIF Vs Ex. Fix. in Complex Pilon FracturesPilon FractureNCT05141227Ain Shams University60
招募中
2 期
Short Stitch Versus Traditional Suture for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Open HepatectomyMetastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the LiverPrimary Malignant Liver NeoplasmLiver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct NeoplasmNCT04982653M.D. Anderson Cancer Center140
已完成
不适用
A Randomized Clinical Study Based on Comparison Between Closure of Uterine Incision With Vicryl 2/0 Versus Vicryl 1 in Development of Uterine Niche.Cesarean Section DehiscenceNCT05770115Cairo University264
已完成
不适用
A New Technique for Uterine Incision Closure at The Time of Cesarean Section: Does it Make a DifferenceCesarean SectionWound DehiscenceNCT04681378Menoufia University120