Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04391543
NCT04391543UnknownNot Applicable

BIOpsychosocial Approach of the CAncer-RElated FAtigue

Le Mans Universite2 sites in 1 country86 target enrollmentStarted: November 15, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
86
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Physical characteristics 1

Study Overview

Brief Summary

One of the most common and stressful side effects of the disease and associated treatments is cancer-related fatigue. It deeply disrupts quality of life and can have a negative impact on patient survival. However, cancer-related fatigue is largely underestimated by patients and poorly taken into account by clinicians. One of the reasons for its poor management is a lack of knowledge of the underlying mechanisms and risk factors.

Although a multiplicity of factors are associated with the appearance of cancer-related fatigue, we do not know their respective share, nor the nature of their interactions. The phenomenon studied reveals complex and systemic interactions between the biological, psychological and social dimensions. Recent systematic reviews clearly identify 2 locks currently preventing a better understanding of the mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue: i) lack of longitudinal studies, ii) lack of interdisciplinary studies. It is precisely these two challenges that the BIOCARE FActory project wishes to respond to.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient followed at the Victor Hugo Clinic, Le Mans.
  • Patients aged >or= 18 and < 80 years old at the time of inclusion
  • Patients with a histologically proven primary breast cancer from stage I to IIIc
  • Naive patient of anti-cancer treatment for this cancer
  • Agreement to participate in the study by written, informed and signed consent of the patient
  • Affiliated patients or beneficiaries of a social security scheme
  • ECOG Performance Status score ≤ 2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Comorbidity which can explain the symptoms of fatigue (Long-term illness other than cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome)
  • Breathing difficulties requiring the use of respiratory assistance
  • Signs of polyneuropathy, amyotrophy or myasthenic syndrome
  • Contraindications to physical exercise linked to heart failure.
  • Treatment based on psychostimulants, psychotropics, antidepressants, antiepileptics or benzodiazepines for more than 3 months at the time of the study
  • Presence or history of psychosis, bipolarity or severe depression
  • History of stroke
  • History of chronic fatigue
  • History of musculoskeletal disorders of the lower limbs
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • Patient unable to undergo protocol monitoring for psychological, social, family or geographic reasons

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Physical characteristics 1

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of height (in meters)

Physical characteristics 2

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of mass (in kilograms)

Physical characteristics 4

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of leg volum

Cognitive function 2

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (higher score means better outcome)

Fatigability

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline at critical force test measurement

Functional cardio-respiratory capability

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of the maximum volum of oxygen during Astrand-Rhyming test

Sarcopenia 1

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of body masse index

Quality of life status

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life C30 questionnaire score (higher score means better outcome)

Sociability status

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of a Comprehensive interview

Fatigue

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Fatigue questionnaire score (higher score means worse outcome)

Postural stability

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of maximum displacement speed of pressure centre at the postural stability test

Physical characteristics 3

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of fat mass (in percentage)

Cognitive function 3

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of Trail Making test score (higher score means worse outcome)

Sarcopenia 2

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of musculo-skeletal index measurement on the third lumbar vertebra on scanner

Cognitive function 1

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of Stroop test score (higher score means worse outcome)

Anxiety

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale score (higher score means worse outcome)

Emotional function

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of the Brief Cope test score

Level of activity

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of actimetry mesurement

Inflammatory status (pro-inflammatory cytokines)

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of blood inflammatory markers determined by ELISA test (pro-inflammatory cytokines : IL-6, TNFα, IL-8, IL-1β)

Inflammatory status (anti inflammatory cytokine)

Time Frame: 18 months

Change from baseline of blood inflammatory markers determined by ELISA test ( anti inflammatory cytokine : IL-1ra)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Le Mans Universite
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials