Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00636168
NCT00636168
Completed
Phase 3

Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Anti-CTLA-4 Monoclonal Antibody (Ipilimumab) Versus Placebo After Complete Resection of High Risk Stage III Melanoma: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase 3 Trial of the EORTC Melanoma Group

Bristol-Myers Squibb21 sites in 2 countries1,211 target enrollmentJune 30, 2008

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
ipilimumab
Conditions
High Risk Stage III Melanoma
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Enrollment
1211
Locations
21
Primary Endpoint
Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if ipilimumab is effective in preventing or delaying recurrence and prolongs survival after complete resection of high risk stage III melanoma

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 30, 2008
End Date
November 26, 2018
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Complete and adequate resection of Stage III melanoma with histologically confirmed melanoma metastatic to lymph node
  • Disease-free
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1
  • Randomization within 12 weeks of surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior therapy for melanoma except surgery
  • Auto-immune disease

Arms & Interventions

A

Intervention: ipilimumab

B

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

Time Frame: Date of randomization to first date of recurrence or death or last available disease assessment with RFS data up to 5 years. Median follow-up was 2.7 years.

Recurrence free survival (RFS) was programmatically determined based on the disease recurrence data provided by the IRC and was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first recurrence or death (whatever the cause), whichever occurred first. A participant who died without reported recurrence was considered to have recurrence on the date of death. For those participants who remained alive and recurrence-free, RFS was censored on the date of last evaluable post-randomization tumor assessment. For those who remained alive and had no recorded post-randomization tumor assessment, RFS was censored on the day of randomization. Participants with disease at baseline were considered to have an event on the day of randomization. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were mandatory to establish recurrence. The primary analysis was event-driven and planned when at least 512 RFS events assessed per IRC were collected.

Number of Participants With Recurrence or Death as Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

Time Frame: Date of randomization to first date of recurrence or death or last available disease assessment with RFS data upto 5 years. Median follow-up was 2.7 years.

Recurrence was defined as appearance of one or more new melanoma lesions: local, regional or distant metastasis. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were mandatory to establish recurrence. A participant who died without reported recurrence was considered to have recurred on the date of death. Disease was assessed at randomization and every 12 weeks (±2 weeks) for 3 years, then every 24 weeks until documented distant progression.

Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Rates Per IRC at 1 Year, 2 Years, and 3 Years in the ITT Population

Time Frame: At years 1, 2, and 3

Yearly recurrence-free survival rates, eg. at 1 year, defined as the probability that a participant was recurrence-free at 1 year following randomization, were estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, along with their corresponding log-log transformed 95% confidence intervals. RFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first recurrence or death (whatever the cause), whichever occurred first. A participant who died without reported recurrence was considered to have recurrence on the date of death. For those who remained alive and recurrence-free, RFS was censored on the date of last evaluable post-randomization tumor assessment. For those who remained alive and had no recorded post-randomization tumor assessment, RFS was censored on the day of randomization. Participants with disease at baseline were considered to have an event on the day of randomization. CT and MRI were mandatory to establish recurrence.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population(From June 2008 to January 2016 (approximately 90 months))
  • Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Non-serious AEs (NSAEs) and Number of Deaths: Overall Study(SAEs and NSAEs: Day 1 up to 70 days after last dose(safety window). Deaths: All deaths regardless of 70 day safety window.Up to 10 years)
  • Overall Survival in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population(From June 2008 to January 2016 (approximately 90 months))
  • Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) Rates Per IRC at 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years in the ITT Population(At years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
  • Rate of Overall Survival (OS)(From date of randomization to date of death, assessed up to 9 years)
  • Exposure Adjusted Incidence Rate of Adverse Events Including Multiple Occurrences of Unique Events(Day 1 up to 70 days after last dose; up to 5 years)
  • Number of Participants With Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population(From June 2008 to January 2016 (approximately 90 months))
  • Number of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment, Serious AEs (SAEs), Drug-Related SAEs, Immune-related AEs (irAEs), Immune-mediated Adverse Reactions (imARs), Deaths in Treated Population(Day 1 up to 70 days after last dose; up to 5 years)
  • Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Scores at Each Assessment Timepoint(Baseline up to 2 years from randomization)

Study Sites (21)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Terminated
Phase 2
A Study of Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody in Patients With Advanced Synovial SarcomaSynovial Sarcoma
NCT00140855Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research6
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Efficacy Study of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo to Prevent Recurrence After Complete Resection of High Risk Stage III MelanomaHigh Risk Stage III melanomaMedDRA version: 19.0 Level: PT Classification code 10025670 Term: Malignant melanoma stage III System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
EUCTR2007-001974-10-DKBristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation1,050
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Efficacy Study of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo to Prevent Recurrence After Complete Resection of High Risk Stage III MelanomaHigh Risk Stage III melanomaMedDRA version: 19.0 Level: PT Classification code 10025670 Term: Malignant melanoma stage III System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
EUCTR2007-001974-10-FIBristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation1,050
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Efficacy Study of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo to Prevent Recurrence After Complete Resection of High Risk Stage III Melanoma
EUCTR2007-001974-10-SEBristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation1,050
Completed
Phase 3
Adjuvant immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (ipilimumab) versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk Stage III melanoma: A randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trial of the EORTC Melanoma GroupCancermelanoma10040900
NL-OMON47131Bristol-Myers Squibb60