DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Conditions
- Venous ThromboembolismDeep Venous ThrombosisPost-Thrombotic Syndrome
- Interventions
- Device: ClotTriever System
- Registration Number
- NCT05701917
- Lead Sponsor
- Inari Medical
- Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of an interventional strategy using the ClotTriever System to achieve and maintain vessel patency (ClotTriever Intervention Arm) versus conservative medical management using anticoagulation therapy alone (Conservative Medical Management Arm) in the treatment of subjects with symptomatic unilateral iliofemoral DVT. The study will collect data on demographics, comorbidities, details from the DVT diagnosis and treatment, and clinical outcomes through the 6-month follow up visit.
- Detailed Description
The study will compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with an interventional strategy using the ClotTriever System to achieve and maintain vessel patency (ClotTriever Intervention Arm) versus conservative medical management using anticoagulation therapy alone (Conservative Medical Management Arm) in the treatment of symptomatic unilateral iliofemoral DVT. Approximately 300 subjects will be enrolled and randomized. All subjects who sign informed consent and who meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomized (1:1, ClotTriever Intervention Arm or Conservative Medical Management Arm).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Interventional ClotTriever System Interventional strategy using the ClotTriever System to achieve and maintain vessel patency (ClotTriever Intervention Arm).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Composite clinical endpoint constructed as a win ratio, a hierarchy of the following: 180 Days (+-14 Days) 1. Occurrence of treatment failure or therapy escalation
2. Assessment of PTS severity, as defined by the Villalta scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of PTS Severity: 180 Days (+-14 Days) a. Assessment of PTS severity, as defined by the Villalta scale
Composite clinical endpoint constructed as a win ratio, a hierarchy of the following: 10 Days (+- 3 Days) 1. Vessel compressibility assessed by duplex ultrasound
2. Pain as assessed by the NPRS
3. An improvement of edema as assessed by leg calf circumference measurements
Trial Locations
- Locations (60)
University Medical Center of Southern Nevada
🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Honor Health
🇺🇸Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Pima Heart and Vascular
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
UCI Medical Center
🇺🇸Orange, California, United States
Vascular and Interventional Specialists of Orange County
🇺🇸Orange, California, United States
University Of Colorado
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Yale University
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
MedStar Health Research Institution
🇺🇸Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Manatee Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Bradenton, Florida, United States
Lakeland Vascular Institute
🇺🇸Lakeland, Florida, United States
Scroll for more (50 remaining)University Medical Center of Southern Nevada🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United StatesRyan Rimer, MDContact