Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Bone Augmentation
- Interventions
- Procedure: Perforated collagen membraneProcedure: Occlusive collagen membrane
- Registration Number
- NCT04775940
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by :
1. clinical and Radiographic analysis .
2. Histomorphometric analysis .
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
- Healthy adult patients.
- Both sex, males and females. 3-Age from 20 - 40 years old. 4-All patients will be free from any systemic diseases as evidenced by Burkett's oral medicine health history questionnaire.
5-Remaining alveolar bone ≥ 8mm vertically and ≤ 4 mm horizontally. 6-Gingival biotype 1-2mm thickness.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- Smokers.
- Pregnant and breast feeding females.
- Mentally retarded Patients.
- Presence of hematologic disease.
- Previous radiation, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressive treatments.
- Diabetes mellitus, metabolic bone disease, ongoing treatment with bisphosphonates drugs, or pregnancy.
- Anticoagulant drugs, Endocarditis risk factors, renal and hepatic failure
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Perforated collagen membrane Perforated collagen membrane - Occlusive collagen membrane Occlusive collagen membrane -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Horizontal alveolar bone width in mm 6 months Measured By Bone caliber and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt