MedPath

Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bone Augmentation
Interventions
Procedure: Perforated collagen membrane
Procedure: Occlusive collagen membrane
Registration Number
NCT04775940
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by :

1. clinical and Radiographic analysis .

2. Histomorphometric analysis .

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Healthy adult patients.
  2. Both sex, males and females. 3-Age from 20 - 40 years old. 4-All patients will be free from any systemic diseases as evidenced by Burkett's oral medicine health history questionnaire.

5-Remaining alveolar bone ≥ 8mm vertically and ≤ 4 mm horizontally. 6-Gingival biotype 1-2mm thickness.

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Smokers.
  2. Pregnant and breast feeding females.
  3. Mentally retarded Patients.
  4. Presence of hematologic disease.
  5. Previous radiation, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressive treatments.
  6. Diabetes mellitus, metabolic bone disease, ongoing treatment with bisphosphonates drugs, or pregnancy.
  7. Anticoagulant drugs, Endocarditis risk factors, renal and hepatic failure
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Perforated collagen membranePerforated collagen membrane-
Occlusive collagen membraneOcclusive collagen membrane-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Horizontal alveolar bone width in mm6 months

Measured By Bone caliber and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath