Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
- Conditions
- Keratoconjunctivitis SiccaDry Eye Syndromes
- Interventions
- Drug: Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic SuspensionDrug: KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
- Registration Number
- NCT02819284
- Lead Sponsor
- Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).
- Detailed Description
This is a Phase 3, multi-center, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension versus vehicle in subjects with dry eye disease.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 909
- Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the investigational product(s) or components
- History of glaucoma, IOP>21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye.
- Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening.
- In the opinion of the Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension - KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean change from baseline for bulbar conjunctival hyperemia in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean ocular discomfort between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of Subjects With ≥ 1 Unit Improvement From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia Worst Region at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Proportion of subjects with ≥1 improvement from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia scores in the study eye. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Change From Baseline/ Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 3 (Day 8) Comparison of ocular discomfort scores between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse using 3-day mean scores.
Change From Baseline/Week 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Scores to Day 4 Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Day 4 Comparison of mean ocular discomfort between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores at Day 3 (Diary) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Day 3 Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Eye Dryness Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean eye dryness between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Eye Dryness Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 3 (Day 8) Comparison of mean eye dryness between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores on Day 2 (Diary) Minus Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Day 1 Comparison of mean ocular discomfort between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Frequency Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean ocular discomfort frequency between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Subject-rated Ocular Discomfort Frequency Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 3 (Day 8) Comparison of mean ocular discomfort frequency between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean corneal fluorescein staining in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using methods developed by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Dry Eye Workshop in evaluating 5 regions of the cornea (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and central) using a 0-3 grading scale, where 0 = no visible staining, 1 = Mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe.
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Nasal Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15) Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean nasal corneal fluorescein staining in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using methods developed by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Dry Eye Workshop in evaluating 5 regions of the cornea (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and central) using a 0-3 grading scale, where 0 = no visible staining, 1 = Mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe.
Change From Baseline/Week 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) in a Subgroup Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) - Visit 4 (Day 15) Comparison of mean ocular discomfort between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse, in a sub-group of participants with more severe ocular discomfort at baseline, using 3 day means.
Trial Locations
- Locations (62)
UAB School of Optometry
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Arizona Eye Center
🇺🇸Chandler, Arizona, United States
NEA Baptist Clinic
🇺🇸Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Sall Research Medical Center
🇺🇸Artesia, California, United States
Milton M. Hom, OD, FAAO
🇺🇸Azusa, California, United States
Family Eye Care Center
🇺🇸Campbell, California, United States
Orange County Ophthalmology
🇺🇸Garden Grove, California, United States
Lugene Eye Institute
🇺🇸Glendale, California, United States
The Gavin Herbert Eye Institute
🇺🇸Irvine, California, United States
Macy Eye Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Scroll for more (52 remaining)UAB School of Optometry🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States