Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT00848133
NCT00848133CompletedPhase 4

A Comparison of Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches in Minimally-Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sinai Hospital of Baltimore2 sites in 1 country51 target enrollmentStarted: July 2004Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
51
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Knee Society Score
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the early clinical outcomes of minimally invasive bilateral subvastus and midvastus approaches for total knee arthroplasty.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •patients with advanced bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee for treatment with total knee arthroplasty
  • •patients who wish to undergo bilateral total knee arthroplasty as part of a single surgical procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • •patients who were previously treated with knee arthroplasty

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Knee Society Score

Time Frame: Final follow-up (minimum 24 months)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Radiographic alignment and fixation(Final follow-up (minimum 24 months))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Assessing the Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach Versus Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.Total Hip Replacement Surgery
NCT06659198I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio50
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Lung cAncer Robotic Comparative StudyLung Cancer
NCT06038227Intuitive Surgical600
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparative Effectiveness of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingCoronary Artery DiseaseHeart DiseasesMyocardial Ischemia
NCT02047266Vitebsk Regional Clinical Hospital150
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRSRenal Stone
NCT02067221Seoul National University Hospital70
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of 2 methods for treatment of missing gums in between teeth.
CTRI/2024/02/063384Bindu DR