跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02799628
NCT02799628已完成不适用

Positive Appraisal Improve Trust Between Patients and Therapists, and Change Treatment Effects

Taoyuan General Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2016年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
32
试验地点
2
主要终点
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group

研究概览

简要总结

The trust between patients and medical providers is the cornerstone to obtain success treatment. To boost the trust can increase medical prescription compliance, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve the effectiveness of treatment. Otherwise, mistrust between medical providers and patients will result in ineffective treatment and excessive defensive health care. This situation may cause medical dispute and medical resources wasting problems.

Most of treatment complete in a few times of admissions and interventions. So, how to improve the trust between patients and doctors quickly became a more knotty problem. Several studies found that speech (including listening, showing compassion, and take longer to explain), reputation, clothing, offer a newer therapy were more important than age, title, and sex.

However, past researches were restricted to an unclear causal relationship. That is they can't be determined whether good doctor-patient relationship and better trust conditions create a longer visit time, better satisfaction, and good reputation, or vice versa. They also unable to clarify whether the high degree of trust result in improved treatment effects, or good relationship result from good medical outcomes.

Investigators want to design a randomized control trial by giving patients recommendation and physical therapist introductions to enhance the trust of patients to therapists. And this study may verify whether enhance trust between therapists and patients will lead to changes in treatment effectiveness.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First time visit to Taoyuan general hospital rehabilitation ward at 2016/07/01~2017/12/31
  • Diagnosis with L spine spondylosis, L spine Herniated Inter-vertebral Disc, or non-acute low back muscle strain
  • Suitable for physical therapy with ( Hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise )
  • most pain score >2

排除标准

  • poor of follow oral order, or patients who can't understand Chinese, including patients with aphasia or dementia
  • patient who can not received 4 weeks of physical therapy
  • other cause of low back pain which can't treatment with physical therapy, including : (Urinary tract stones, infection, rapid progression disease which need immediately operation)

研究组 & 干预措施

intervention

Active Comparator
  1. Give the physical therapy of low back pain educational video + therapist introduction and recommendation video, at the first time of clinic visit.
  2. Physical therapy with hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

干预措施: intervention (Behavioral)

intervention

Active Comparator
  1. Give the physical therapy of low back pain educational video + therapist introduction and recommendation video, at the first time of clinic visit.
  2. Physical therapy with hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

干预措施: placebo (Other)

placebo

Placebo Comparator
  1. Give the physical therapy of low back pain educational video, at the first time of clinic visit.
  2. Physical therapy with hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

干预措施: placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group

时间窗: The first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.

Success treatment proportion between intervention group and placebo group 4 weeks after intervention

时间窗: data collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visit

Success treatment is defined as the most pain score decrease from baseline more than 2 degree. ( Pain score change from baseline by Visual Analogue Scale after 4 weeks)

次要结局

  • Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group(The second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit)
  • Change of pain score with The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C) between intervention group and placebo group(data collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit)
  • Change of the compression force to trigger the tenderness point from baseline(data collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit)

研究者

发起方
Taoyuan General Hospital
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验