Marijuana Effects on Simulated Driving Performance
- Conditions
- Marijuana UsageAlcohol DrinkingCannabisCannabis UseMarijuana
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03699540
- Lead Sponsor
- Shanna Babalonis, PhD
- Brief Summary
This study will examine the effects of various strains of marijuana on simulated driving performance; the effects of alcohol administration will also be examined to further understand how marijuana-induced driving changes compare to the effects of alcohol. Secondary outcomes will include physiological effects, subjective- and observer-rated outcomes, and psychomotor performance under the various dose conditions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- Healthy, adult participants
- Ages 21-50
- History of marijuana use
- History of alcohol use
- Clinically significant medical conditions
- Ongoing/significant drug use outside of marijuana and alcohol use
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Inactive Marijuana Dose Inactive marijuana Participants will receive experimental/non-therapeutic dose(s) of inactive marijuana, under double-blind conditions Inactive Alcohol Dose placebo alcohol Participants will receive experimental/non-therapeutic dose(s) of inactive alcohol, under double-blind conditions Active Alcohol Dose Alcohol Participants will receive experimental/non-therapeutic dose(s) of active alcohol, under double-blind conditions Active Marijuana Dose Marijuana Participants will receive experimental/non-therapeutic dose(s) of active marijuana, under double-blind conditions
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP) This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals. Standard deviation of lane position (SDLP) of the car is the amount of weaving/swerving of the car in and out of the lane. It is a frequent metric for assessing driving ability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals. Participants rated their subjective response on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals. Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Subject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty This outcome (VAS score) was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals. Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate worse outcome/greater impairment. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect This outcome (VAS scores) was recorded prior to and in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate greater drug effects. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals. Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Kentucky
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States