Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine Immunotherapy for Warts
- Conditions
- Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine for Multiple Common Warts
- Interventions
- Biological: Intralesional salineBiological: hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)
- Registration Number
- NCT05326152
- Lead Sponsor
- Zagazig University
- Brief Summary
Assessment of the effectiveness of intralesional and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in treatment of multiple common warts.
- Detailed Description
Recently, intralesional immunotherapy by different antigens, including Candida antigen and purified protein derivative PPD has been proved effective in the treatment of different types of warts. Hepatitis B vaccine is one of the DNA vaccines that are regarded as being potentially safer, relatively cheap and easy to produce with no special storage requirements because they are extremely stable and allow for potential simultaneous immunization against multiple antigens or pathogens via co-expression of multiple epitopes on single plasmid. Hepatitis B vaccine could be a promising immunotherapeutic vaccine in the field of intralesional immunotherapy of warts. Moreover, the efficacy of intramuscular injection of hepatitis B vaccine would be assessed and compared to its intralesional injection.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
• Adult patients of both sexes with multiple (> 3 warts) common warts of various sites, sizes and duration, with or without distant warts after taking informed consent from all patients
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction to a prior dose of the vaccine or to any of its components.
- Allergic skin disorders such as generalized eczema and urticaria.
- Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever.
- Previous wart therapy within 1 month prior to the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intralesional saline Intralesional saline 0.2 ml of saline injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions IntralesionaL Hepatitis B vaccine hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India) 0.2 ml of hepatitis B vaccine injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions Intramuscular Hepatitis B vaccine hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India) 0.5 ml injected in the deltoid muscle for those who were younger than 19 years at the time of study and 1 ml for those who were 20 years and older at the time of study. Three injections were done at 0, 1, and 4 months.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Efficacy of intralesional versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in the treatment of multiple common warts up to 3 months after last injection Percentage of patients showing complete response to intralesional hepatitis B vaccine and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine.
Complete response: complete disappearance of warts including distant warts and complete return of normal skin markings (100%).
Partial response: if the warts have regressed in size by 50-99%. No response: less than 50% decrease in wart size.Immediate adverse effects up to 20 minutes after intralesional or intramuscular injection of vaccine
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recurrence for 6 months-follow-up after complete clearance of all warts
Efficacy of intralesional versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in distant wart response up to 3 months Percentage of patients showing complete response of their distant warts to intralesional hepatitis B vaccine and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine.
Complete response: complete disappearance of distant warts and complete return of normal skin markings (100%).
Partial response: if the distant warts have regressed in size by 50-99%. No response: less than 50% decrease in distant wart size.Late adverse effects up to 6 months follow-up period
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Zagazig university
🇪🇬Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt