Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07490782
NCT07490782RecruitingNot Applicable

Nutritional Intervention for College Students With Depression

University of California, San Diego1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2026Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Sleep onset

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of nutritional interventions in college students with depression. The main outcomes it aims to measure are:

  • Nutritional content, meal timing, and sleep patterns in college students with depression
  • Feasibility of nutritional interventions (Mediterranean Diet and Time-Restricted Eating + Mediterranean Diet) in college students with depression

Researchers will compare two groups - Mediterranean Diet (Med-Diet) and Time-Restricted Eating + Mediterranean Diet (TRE + Med-Diet) - to assess adherence to the dietary interventions and overall feasibility of the study procedures.

Participants will:

  • Complete a 2-week baseline logging diet, sleep, activity, and mood
  • Be randomized to Mediterranean Diet (Med-Diet) or Time-Restricted Eating + Med-Diet (TRE + Med-Diet)
  • Participate in dietary counseling with a registered dietitian during the 8-week intervention
  • Continue to log diet, wear an actigraphy device, and complete mood, sleep, and diet assessments throughout the intervention

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years and enrolled as a college student
  • Symptoms of mild to moderate depression
  • Receiving treatment for depression or willing to receive treatment during study participation
  • Generally in good physical health
  • On a stable dose of any medication affecting weight, metabolism, or mental health

Exclusion Criteria

  • Elevated risk for suicide
  • Inability to participate safely, as determined by the study physician
  • Lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Current eating disorder (e.g., bulimia, anorexia nervosa, binge eating)
  • Current alcohol or substance use disorder
  • Shift work outside of class schedule in the past 30 days
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Treatment with an investigational drug for depression or participation in another study requiring modification of diet

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Sleep onset

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Actigraphy determined sleep onset time (h:m)

Sleep offset

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Actigraphy determined sleep offset time (h:m)

Sleep Duration

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Formula: sleep offset - sleep onset (h:m). A larger number indicates a longer sleep duration.

M10

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Average activity level from 10 hours of highest activity (counts/hour)

L5

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Average activity level from 5 hours of lowest activity (counts/hour)

Relative Amplitude

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Formula: Relative Amplitude =(M10-L5)/(M10+L5). A value near 1 indicates a strong, well-defined circadian rhythm (high activity during the day and very low activity at night), and a value near 0 indicates a fragmented or "flat" rhythm (little difference between your most active and least active periods).

Interdaily Stability

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

The ratio of the variance of the average 24-hour activity profile to the variance of the overall 24-hour data. Actigraphy is collected over 2 weeks and averaged to create a single, representative 24-hour profile. Interdaily Stability values range from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates a total lack of stability and 1 indicates perfect stability. Lower values suggest fragmented, weak, or disrupted circadian rhythms.

Caloric intake timing

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of baseline (2 weeks)

Time of calorie consumption (h:m)

MEQ Score

Time Frame: Baseline measure in week 2

The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) is a 19-item self-report assessment used to determine an individual's circadian preference (chronotype), ranging from morning-type to evening-type. Scores range from 16 to 86, with higher scores indicating morningness and lower scores indicating eveningness.

PHQ9 Score

Time Frame: Baseline measure in week 2

The PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-report questionnaire used to screen for and measure the severity of depression in clinical trials. It covers the 9 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder based on the DSM-IV. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.

PDQ-D5 Score

Time Frame: Baseline measure in week 2

The PDQ-D5 is a self-report questionnaire assessing subjective cognitive impairment. It includes five items covering four subscales: Attention/Concentration, Retrospective Memory, Prospective Memory, and Planning/Organization. The total score is the sum of the five items, ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater perceived cognitive deficits, while lower scores indicate fewer problems.

PSQI Score

Time Frame: Baseline measure in week 2

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item self-report questionnaire assessing sleep quality and disturbances over a one-month interval. It measures seven components (quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbances, medication, dysfunction) to produce a global score from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

Recruitment Rate

Time Frame: From study initiation to end of recruitment period (approximately 16 months)

Formula: Total participants enrolled / enrollment time window, with higher numbers indicating better recruitment.

Retention Rate

Time Frame: From enrollment to study completion (approximately 19 months)

Formula: (number of participants that complete the study / number of participants that enrolled) x 100, reported as percentage with higher numbers indicating higher retention.

Missing Data Rate

Time Frame: From baseline to end of study visit (weeks 1-12)

The missing data rate is defined as the percentage of expected data points for primary outcomes (e.g., daily food logs, daily actigraphy wearing, and survey responses) that were not collected or were unusable at the final study visit. Calculation: (Number of missing data points / Total number of expected data points across all enrolled participants) × 100 reported as a percentage with higher values indicating more missing data. Note: This includes data missing due to participant withdrawal or non-response to specific survey items.

Change in Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (13-MEDAS) Score

Time Frame: Measured at baseline in week 2 and during intervention in week 10

Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet is assessed using the validated 13-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (13-MEDAS). The questionnaire evaluates the consumption frequency of Mediterranean dietary staples (e.g., olive oil, vegetables, fruits, nuts, fish, legumes) and frequency of unhealthy food choices (e.g., animal fats, sugar-sweetened beverages). Each item is scored 0 or 1. The total score ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.

Time-restricted eating adherence

Time Frame: Measured throughout nutritional intervention (week 3-11)

Using the time of first and last caloric intake of the day, time-restricted eating adherence is calculated as the percentage of days where all food was consumed within the designated 10 h time window.

Mediterranean Diet Intervention Acceptability

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

Participant-reported manageability of diet changes on study team generated Intervention Acceptability Survey. A single item ("The Mediterranean diet changes were manageable") will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Data for all participants reported. Higher values indicate diet content modifications were more manageable.

Time-Restricted Eating Intervention Acceptability

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

Participant-reported manageability of diet changes on study team generated Intervention Acceptability Survey. A single item ("The time restriction on calorie intake was manageable") will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Data reported for Group 2 only (Mediterranean Diet + Time-Restricted Eating). Higher values indicate diet timing modifications were more manageable.

Participant-Reported Global Impression of Change in Depression

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

A single-item assessment of the overall change in depression since study entry. Scale: 1 = Very Much Worse, 2 = Much Worse, 3 = Minimally Worse, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Improved, 6 = Much Improved, 7 = Very Much Improved. Higher scores indicate greater improvement.

Perceived Impact of Dietary Changes on Sleep

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

A single item ("The dietary changes made during the study had a positive impact on my sleep") will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate a more positive perceived impact.

Perceived Impact of Dietary Changes on Metabolic Health

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

A single item ("The dietary changes made during the study had a positive impact on my metabolic health") will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate a more positive perceived impact.

Perceived Impact of Dietary Changes on Overall Health

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

A single item ("The dietary changes made during the study had a positive impact on my overall health") will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate a more positive perceived impact.

Participant-Reported Intent for Long-term Dietary Maintenance

Time Frame: End of study (week 10-12)

A single-item assessment of the participant's intention to continue the intervention diet after the study concludes ('I plan to maintain dietary changes from the study moving forward') will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate a higher intent to maintain the dietary changes.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Sleep Duration(Baseline (week 1-2) and intervention (week 9-11))
  • Change in Relative Amplitude(Baseline (week 1-2) and intervention (week 9-11))
  • Change in Interdaily Stability(Baseline (weeks 1-2) and intervention (weeks 9-11))
  • Change in PHQ9(Baseline (week 2) and intervention (week 10))
  • Change in PDQ-D5 Score(Baseline (week 2) and intervention (week 10))
  • Change in PSQI Score(Baseline (week 2) and intervention (week 10))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michael McCarthy

Professor

University of California, San Diego

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Nutritional Intervention for College... | Clinical Trial