跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04592003
NCT04592003招募中不适用

French Colorectal ESD Cohort in Experts Centers

University Hospital, Limoges25 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,200 人开始时间: 2020年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
1,200
试验地点
25
主要终点
R0 Resection rate of submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal lesions

研究概览

简要总结

Initially developed in Japan for the treatment of endemic superficial gastric cancers, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows resection of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the digestive tract into a single fragment. It allows a perfect pathological analysis, and decreases the rate of recurrence of the adenoma to less than 2%. However, this procedure, which is technically more challenging, is also more risky (perforation rate at 4% vs. 1% for WF-EMR) and longer. Submucosal dissection is also more expensive in terms of equipment, but this difference can be offset by the cost of the high number of iterative colonoscopies required in patients who have had endoscopic resection by WF-EMR.

Scientific debate is agitating the Western world1,2 and Japanese experts do not perform WF-EMR anymore, whereas no comparative prospective study has compared these two procedures.

A lot of centers in France performed colorectal ESD even for benign lesions and nationwide data about safety and efficiency is required to confirm the place of ESD for treatment of large superficial colorectal lesions.

The aim of this French multicenter cohort is to analyze the results of colorectal submucosal dissection on a large scale.

详细描述

Initially developed in Japan for the treatment of endemic superficial gastric cancers, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows resection of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the digestive tract into a single fragment. It allows a perfect pathological analysis, and decreases the rate of recurrence of the adenoma to less than 2%. However, this procedure, which is technically more challenging, is also more risky (perforation rate at 4% vs. 1% for WF-EMR) and longer. Submucosal dissection is also more expensive in terms of equipment, but this difference can be offset by the cost of the high number of iterative colonoscopies required in patients who have had endoscopic resection by WF-EMR.

Scientific debate is agitating the Western world1,2 and Japanese experts do not perform WF-EMR anymore, whereas no comparative prospective study has compared these two procedures.

A lot of centers in France performed colorectal ESD even for benign lesions and nationwide data about safety and efficiency is required to confirm the place of ESD for treatment of large superficial colorectal lesions.

The aim of this French multicenter cohort is to analyze the results of colorectal submucosal dissection on a large scale.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Other

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients addressed for a colorectal ESD

排除标准

  • Opposition notified in the context of a non-opposition form after reading the information notice

结局指标

主要结局

R0 Resection rate of submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal lesions

时间窗: Month 1

R0 Resection rate according to the definition of of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

次要结局

  • Effectiveness of histological prediction of superficial colorectal lesions treated according to the technological tools used.(Month 1)
  • Endoscopic recurrence rate during the first endoscopic follow-up(Month 6)
  • Monobloc resection rate(Day 1)
  • Monobloc resection rate exclusively in ESD.(Day 1)
  • Curative resection rate(Month 1)
  • Optimal dissection rate(Month 1)
  • 30-day complication rate(Month 1)
  • Curative endoscopic resection rate without surgical management at 36 months(Month 36)
  • Number of metachronous colorectal lesions at 36 months(Month 36)
  • Surgery rate at 36 months(Month 36)
  • Recurrence rate at 36 months(Month 36)
  • Impact of center volume on oncological outcomes, technical outcomes, and procedural complications.(Month 1)
  • Compare oncological and technical outcomes and procedural complications based on colonic or rectal location.(Month 1)
  • Compare procedural outcomes based on the different traction strategies used(Month 1)
  • Analyze the learning curve of new trainees at the time of implementation of the submucosal dissection curriculum of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy.(statitistic analysis)
  • Creation of a difficulty score predicting the success of ESD (R0 resection without perforation)(Month 1)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Limoges
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (25)

Loading locations...

相似试验