A Multicentric Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Parallel Group Comparative Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety & Tolerability
- Conditions
- Secondary hypertension, unspecified,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/09/046074
- Lead Sponsor
- Ajanta Pharma Limited
- Brief Summary
A Multicentric,Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative, Phase IIIClinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety & Tolerability of FDC ofMetoprolol succinate 50/50 mg + Amlodipine 5/5 mg + Chlorthalidone 6.25/12.5 mgTablets versus Co-administration of Metoprolol succinate 50 mg and Amlodipine10 mg Tablets for patients with Uncontrolled Essential Hypertension.
Trial of 84 days with two arms
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 264
- 1.Male or female subjects aged between 18 and 75 years (both inclusive).
- 2.Subjects those who are uncontrolled on FDC of Metoprolol succinate 50 mg + Amlodipine 5 mg.
- 3.Subjects with the history of uncontrolled essential hypertension [having seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) 90 to 110 mmHg and seated systolic BP (SeSBP) 140 to 180 mmHg] who is on the stable dose of two antihypertensive medications in recommended dose for atleast 4 weeks.
- 4.As judged by the Investigator, based on a clinical evaluation performed during the screening period.
- 5.Subjects who are willing to sign informed consent for participation in the study and willing to adhere to all protocol procedures.
- 6.Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable method of contraception or post-menopausal for at least one year or surgically sterile.
- Suspected hypersensitivity to either of the study medications or any of the ingredients of the formulation.
- Subjects with EF <40% as per Simpson’s method on 2D Echo.
- Subjects diagnosed with Secondary or Malignant Hypertension.
- Surgical or medical condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, could interfere with absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the drugs to be used.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean change in SeSBP between baseline and 12 weeks. Mean change in SeSBP between baseline and 12 weeks. | The assessment of safety of subjects [comparison of incidence of treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) The assessment of safety of subjects [comparison of incidence of treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) Mean change in SeSBP between baseline and 12 weeks. | The assessment of safety of subjects [comparison of incidence of treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean change in SeDBP from baseline [Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks]. Mean change in SeSBP from baseline [Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks].
Trial Locations
- Locations (12)
Aartham Multi Super Speciality Hospital
🇮🇳Ahmadabad, GUJARAT, India
Dr.Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences
🇮🇳Lucknow, UTTAR PRADESH, India
Government Medical College and Govt General Hospital
🇮🇳Srikakulam, ANDHRA PRADESH, India
GSVM Medical College
🇮🇳Dehat, UTTAR PRADESH, India
IPGME & R SSKM Hospital
🇮🇳Kolkata, WEST BENGAL, India
Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College
🇮🇳Ajmer, RAJASTHAN, India
KHIMS Hospital
🇮🇳Dehat, UTTAR PRADESH, India
King George Hospital
🇮🇳Visakhapatnam, ANDHRA PRADESH, India
Lifeline Multispeciality Hospital
🇮🇳Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA, India
Medical college and hospital
🇮🇳Kolkata, WEST BENGAL, India
Scroll for more (2 remaining)Aartham Multi Super Speciality Hospital🇮🇳Ahmadabad, GUJARAT, IndiaDr Kuntal ShahPrincipal investigator8980075065kuntalshah64@gmail.com