Sacral Neuromodulation as Treatment for Fecal Incontinence
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Interventions
- Device: Low level laser therapy (LLLT)
- Registration Number
- NCT03825575
- Lead Sponsor
- McMaster University
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate if low level laser therapy will do more good than harm for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence. It is a proof of concept study without a placebo arm.
- Detailed Description
The therapy consists of a 3 week treatment with a total of 8 sessions of low level laser therapy. Effects will be assessed using symptoms and quality of life questionnaires and physiological assessments of pelvic floor function, at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after beginning of treatment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Patients with fecal incontinence
- Pregnant patients
- Known malignancies in the area of treatment
- Active bleeding in area of treatment
- Active deep vein thrombosis
- When tatoos are present at area of treatment
- Patients that are light sensitive
- Patients who take steroids.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Incontinence and low level laser therapy Low level laser therapy (LLLT) Intervention: Low level laser therapy (sacral neuromodulation or photobiomodulation) will be administered to patients with fecal incontinence
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in number of fecal incontinence episodes 4 weeks and 12 weeks Number of fecal incontinence episodes per week
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in anal sphincter tone 12 weeks Anal sphincter tone (mmHg)
Change in increase of anal sphincter pressure during squeezing 12 weeks Difference between anal sphincter squeeze pressure and resting pressure (mmHg)
Change in squeezing duration 12 weeks Anal sphincter sustained squeezing duration (seconds)
Change in Quality of Life 4 weeks and 12 weeks The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Assessment is a subject-completed questionnaire. It is measured in each of four areas of depression/self-perception (7 items), lifestyle (10 items), coping (9 items), and embarrassment (3 items). Area scores are measured on a 1 (worse) to 4 (best) scale and are each the average of their component individual item scores measured on the same scale. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Minimum important difference is 4 (Forte et al., 2016)
Change in symptoms score 4 and 12 weeks St. Mark's Incontinence (Vaizey) Score, it is a scale from 0-24 where 0=perfect continence and 24 is complete continence. Minimal important difference is 3 (Forte et al., 2016)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
McMaster University
🇨🇦Hamilton, Ontario, Canada