Comparison Of Xenogeneic and autogenous membrane in Gingival Recession.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K056- Periodontal disease, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/12/022502
- Lead Sponsor
- Benita Maria Regi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1. Patients belonging to the age group of 35 to 60 years.
2. Millerâ??s class I or class II gingival recession.
3. Systemically healthy patients.
4. Patients who have not received any periodontal treatment for the last 6 months prior to
the clinical examination.
• No known allergy to materials used or prescribed in this study.
1. Smokers and alcoholics.
2. Pregnant and lactating mothers.
3. Patients with the history of Systemic diseases or immune deficiency.
4. Patients with active periodontal diseases or with a history of periodontal surgical
treatment in the past 24 months on the involved sites.
• Patients with trauma from occlusion, rotated, mobile and malposed teeth.
• Patients using medications that modify oral tissue retort during the last 6 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Recession depth (from CEJ to gingival margin) <br/ ><br>2. Recession width <br/ ><br>3. Relative attachment level (from stent to gingival margin) <br/ ><br>4. Clinical attachment levelTimepoint: 1. baseline <br/ ><br>2. 3 months <br/ ><br>3. 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method DIFFRENCE OF RECESSION IN AGE AND GENDERTimepoint: 6 MONTHS