MedPath

Platelet Lysate vs Saline for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Registration Number
NCT06924853
Lead Sponsor
Regenexx, LLC
Brief Summary

This is a randomized trial to evaluate and compare platelet lysate epidural injection to saline epidural injection for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy (sciatica).

Detailed Description

This single-center, single-blind, randomized-controlled clinical trial will enroll approximately 20 participants, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either autologous PL (N=10) or saline (N=10) epidural injections for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Prior to enrollment, patients will undergo evaluation of medical history, back pain history, lumbar examination, radicular symptoms, medication use and review lumbar spine imaging.

Treatment will consist of lumbar transforaminal epidural at affected level/side. On the morning of the procedure, all patients will undergo a blood draw to maintain blinding of study condition. Patients in the active treatment group will receive an epidural injection of platelet lysate. Patients in the control group will receive an epidural injection of saline.

Patients will be blinded to study condition until the 3-month post-treatment follow-up. After completing the 3-month surveys, the patients will be unblinded. Patients that had been in the saline control group will be given the opportunity to cross-over into the active treatment group and re-start study timeline, completing follow-up surveys at 1, 2, 3- and 6- months.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the changes in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups (control versus treatment) for leg pain. Secondary objectives include comparing the change scores of other patient reported outcomes of back pain and function at 3-months, as well as continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 6-months in active treatment group. Change scores will be calculated by taking the difference between the 3-month scores and the baseline scores. Patients will complete subject-reported clinical questionnaires at pre-treatment, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months, and 6-months (6-m questionnaires only in the active treatment group).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Must be 18-65 years of age, inclusive, at time of signing informed consent
  2. At least moderate pain at screening using Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
  3. Diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) radiating to or below the knee in a single dermatomal pattern (L4, L5, or S1) with onset of clinical symptoms less than 2 year prior to screening visit
  4. Presence of one of the following: a radicular pattern (L4, L5, or S1) of sensory, reflex or strength changes
  5. Presence of persistent unilateral radicular pain. Have significant leg pain, numbness, or tingling that causes the patient to alter or change activities.
  6. LSR pain with inadequate response to conservative care (non-operative); participants must have tried at least one anti-inflammatory or analgesic medication (for at least 2 weeks at adequate doses) and at least one of the following: Physical therapy, bed rest, chiropractic manipulations, home directed lumbar and/or exercise programs.
  7. Lumbar spine MRI images are available after the onset of clinical symptoms and correlate with localization of clinical symptoms. CT is acceptable for patients with contraindication for MRI.
  8. Is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with post-treatment evaluations and visits.
  9. Voluntary signature of the IRB approved Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Untreated underlying psychological conditions (e.g. depression, chronic pain syndrome, etc.) as a contributor of pain
  2. Bleeding disorders
  3. Currently taking anticoagulant or immunosuppressive medication
  4. Evidence on MRI or CT of recent vertebral fracture or segmental instability (spondylolisthesis)
  5. Inflammatory or auto-immune based pathology (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia, polymyositis, gout, pseudogout, etc.)
  6. Co-existing hip or knee pain localized to the joint structures that may interfere with the participant's ability to participate in the study or interfere with pain assessments
  7. Any central canal stenosis with neurogenic claudication (not including foraminal stenosis) with pain present mostly during walking and signs of lumbar stenosis on lumbar spine MRI/CT
  8. Has undergone a surgical procedure for back pain (e.g. discectomy, artificial disc replacement, fusion, etc)
  9. Presence of spinal cord stimulator
  10. Received epidural steroid injection or nerve blocks within the last 2 months
  11. Use of chronic opioids
  12. Documented history of drug abuse within the last 6 months
  13. Use of immunosuppressants, oral or intravenous steroids in the last 3 months
  14. Is pregnant
  15. Allergy or intolerance to study medication (e.g. lidocaine, etc.)
  16. Condition represents a worker's comp case and/or is involved in health-related litigation
  17. Presence of clinically significant disease that may interfere with the evaluation of safety and other clinical outcomes in the study
  18. Any other condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from enrollment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-Leg3-months

Difference in Numeric Pain Scale group differences (scale 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in regard to leg pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean modified SANE scoresBaseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Average SANE scores post-treatment; scores range from 0-100 where 0=no improvement and 100=100% improved

Pain medicationsBaseline and 3-months

Changes in medications from pre to post treatment

Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-LegBaseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Changes in NPS from pre to post treatment; scale ranges from 0-10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain

Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-BackBaseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Changes in NPS from pre to post treatment; scale ranges from 0-10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain

Functional Rating Index (FRI)Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Changes in FRI from pre to post treatment and between group differences at 3 months; scales 0-100% where 0%=no disability and 100%=very severe disability

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Changes in ODI from pre to post and between group differences at 3 months; scales 0-100% where 0%=no disability and 100%=very disabled.

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Evaluates all aspects of patients' health and assesses if there has been an improvement or decline in clinical status (From "Very Much Improved" to "Very Much Worse")

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)Baseline

Evaluate the severity of your overall health status (From "None" to "Very Severe"

Incidence rate of adverse events1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Incidence of adverse events after treatment

Incidence rate of surgical/other treatment interventions1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month

Incidence of surgical/other treatment interventions after treatment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Centeno-Schultz Clinic

🇺🇸

Broomfield, Colorado, United States

Centeno-Schultz Clinic
🇺🇸Broomfield, Colorado, United States
Ramara Chavez
Contact
303-429-6448
rchavez@centenoschultz.com
Christopher Centeno, MD
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.