Evaluating the Use of Community Members Trained as Health Coaches to Deliver the HealthyLifetimeTM Program
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Behaviors
- Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Enrollment
- 300
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in Participant Self- rated satisfaction with various aspects of their home and neighborhood.
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 10 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled study is to learn if, in addition to nurses, community members can be trained as health coaches to deliver the HealthyLifetime (HL) program to people without complex chronic health conditions, an intervention that provides a short-term and effective health coaching intervention delivered through a virtual platform to improve health, resiliency, and independent self-care to participants who are without complex chronic conditions. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Can Community Health Coaches achieve the same level of competency and outcome as Nurse Health Coaches in participants without complex chronic conditions?
Detailed Description
The investigators will evaluate the use of trained community members \[Health Coach, (HC)\] in delivering the HealthyLifetime program to adults without complex chronic conditions. Our cumulative learnings about effective HL strategies, training, and outcomes assessments set the stage for the proposed use of trained community members as HL Health Coaches under the supervision of the nurse Clinical Services Manager. The Independent Living Index (ILI) measures 'risk' for loss of independence due to functional decline from complex chronic conditions and other factors. The investigators will use the ILI and other medical information to determine which participants can be appropriately delegated to non-clinical staff coaches, which the investigators define as participants without complex chronic conditions. Our training methods will be adapted for use with community members. Our health coaching competency assessment tools will be used to measure community members trained as Health Coaches and Nurse Health Coach' relative competency. The investigators will compare quantitative and qualitative outcomes between participants coached by HL Health Coaches (community members) vs. HL Nurse Health Coaches and any outcome differences due to demographic, social determinants, or other factors. Finally, the investigators intend to evaluate the program satisfaction and potential cost impact using our Medical Use Index as a proxy for cost savings.
Investigators
Kathleen Potempa
Professor
University of Michigan
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Be at least 30 years of age, with no more than three, uncomplicated chronic conditions and want to learn to take better care of their health.
- •Independent Living Index (ILI) greater than
- •ILI is derived by averaging the outcome measures scores.
- •A score of less than 4 on items related to anxiety and depressive symptoms
- •Have Medicare and/or Medicaid insurance.
- •Be able to read, speak, and hear English - but may use glasses or hearing aids, if needed;
- •Tell us their age, date of birth, address, and phone number, and explain their health problems;
- •Have a computer, iPad (Tablet), or Smartphone with an Internet connection, email address, a working camera, and microphone;
- •Be able to use their computer/tablet to connect to video chat sessions like Zoom in a private space in their home or a private room
- •Are not currently participating in any other studies involving diet, weight management, exercise and/or coaching at the current time; and
Exclusion Criteria
- •● Are less than 30 years of age.
- •Have more than three, uncomplicated chronic conditions.
- •A score of more than 4 on items related to anxiety and depressive symptoms
- •Do not have Medicare and/or Medicaid insurance.
- •Do not reside in Michigan.
- •Have a new acute health problem that requires seeing a doctor more than once a month for acute medical treatment.
- •Have been told their illness is not curable.
- •Need help remembering their name, date of birth, or health problems.
- •Cannot use glasses or a hearing aid to see or hear well enough to read materials on the computer or talk to the nurse easily.
- •Are currently participating in any other studies involving diet, weight management, exercise and/or coaching at the current time; and
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in Participant Self- rated satisfaction with various aspects of their home and neighborhood.
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Participants perception of their home and neighborhood on a scale of 1= Extremely Satisfied to 5 = Not at all satisfied
Satisfaction with Quality of Life
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Questions are about how participant experiences their quality of life on a scale where "1" = "Do not agree at all" and "5" = "Agree completely",
Positive and negative Lifestyle Habits aggregate
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Composite score of activities that participants engage in that affect health in a negative (lower score) or positive way (higher score) on a scale of 1 to 5. Smoking (yes or no), alcohol (number of drinks per week, 5= none, 5= more than eight), exercise (1 = none to 5= more than 3 hours/week), food choices (One serving or less a day to 5 or more servings a day of positive, e.g., vegetable, or negative food choice, e.g., sugary food), amount of sleep (1 = less than 4 to 5 = more than 7 hours)
Change in Goal attainment score
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 12 weeks after study enrollment.
Health goals of participants (up to 3) confidence in achieving goal (1= Not confident at all to 10 = Completely Confident)
Change in Self-efficacy in ability to continue essential life activities
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Ability or confidence of the participant in doing certain activities on a scale of 1= Cannot do this myself/Not confident at all to 5 = Always able to do myself/Completely Confident. For the purposes of answering these questions, confidence is defined as the belief in the participant\'s chances of being able to do and/or complete an activity (e.g., hobbies and recreation, social visits, chores, errands, etc.) or task (e.g., hobbies and recreation, social visits, chores, errands, etc.) successfully however the participant defines it.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Sustained higher values of primary measures at 3 months(20 weeks after study enrollment)
- Change in Self-reported medical visits(At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.)