AmplifEYE Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy
- Conditions
- Adenoma ColonColonic NeoplasmsColon PolypSerrated Polyp
- Interventions
- Device: AmplifEYE
- Registration Number
- NCT03814369
- Lead Sponsor
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Colonoscopy screening is proven to reduce mortality rates for colorectal cancer, which relies on early detection and removal of colonic polyps. AmplifEYE is a FDA-approved device with a row of flexible detection arms attached to the tip of colonoscope which can separate colonic folds during scope withdrawal and is believed to improve polyp detection. Real-life clinical data on this relatively new device is lacking and this study aims to compare the adenoma and polyp detection rates in AmplifEYE-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy.
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital for colonoscopy are randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either colonoscopy equipped with AmplifEYE (AC) or standard colonoscopy (SC). All study team members will have a prior run-in phase of performing at least 5 AmplifEYE colonoscopies before starting the study. The colonic polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), caecal intubation time, colonoscope withdrawal time, procedure pain and any adverse events were analyzed in each group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 355
- Aged between 50 to 79 years old
- Scheduled for screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy
- Colonic strictures
- History of bowel surgery
- Per-rectal bleeding within six weeks
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AmplifEYE colonoscopy AmplifEYE Colonoscopy performed with AmplifEYE equipped
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adenoma detection rate 1 day number of patients in whom at least one adenoma could be found
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method caecal intubation rate 1 day number of patients in whom caecal intubation is acheived
caecal intubation time 1 day time beginning with the insertion of the colonoscope until reaching the caecum
Polyp detection rate 1 day number of patients in whom at least one polyp could be found
Serrated polyp detection rate 1 day number of patients in whom at least one serrated polyp could be found
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Hong Kong, Hong Kong