跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05608655
NCT05608655已完成不适用

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DKutting Balloon Versus Chocolate Balloon in the Treatment of Femoral and Popliteal Artery Stenosis

DK Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.14 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 188 人开始时间: 2022年12月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
188
试验地点
14
主要终点
Achievement of Optimal PTA in Percent

研究概览

简要总结

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DKutting Balloon Versus Chocolate Balloon in the Treatment of Femoral and Popliteal Artery Stenosis

详细描述

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, open-label, noninferior study to evaluate achievement of optimal PTA dilatation. A total of 188 patients will be enrolled from 14 sites in China. All patients enrolled will be assigned to the test group (DKutting LL balloon, n=94) and the control group (Chocolate balloon, n=94) with randomized allocation ratio of 1:1.

Primary endpoint is percentage of PTA cases in which <30% diameter stenosis without a flow limiting dissection is achieved. A 30-day after procedure follow-up will be conducted for all 188 patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18-80 year-old male & non-pregnant female
  • Patients with Arteriosclerosis Obliterans of Lower Extremities, including stenosis or osculation in femoropopliteal artery.
  • Rutherford clinical category-Becker class: 2 to 5
  • Patients understand the purpose of the study, will voluntarily participate in the study and sign informed consent. Patients are willing to undergo clinical follow-up as required by this study.
  • Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) shows femoropopliteal artery stenosis above 70%, appropriate for treatment with balloon angioplasty
  • Reference vessel diameter from 2.5 to 7mm; Total length of lesion is less than 200mm; Total length of osculation lesion is less than 100mm
  • Only one target lesion needs to be Treated. Treatment of non-target lesion, if any, must be completed prior to treatment of target lesion and must be deemed a clinical angiographic success as visually assessed by the physician. The number non-target lesions are limited to maximum 3.

排除标准

  • Acute or sub-acute thrombosis exist in target lesion
  • Severe calcified lesion (PACSS Grading 4)
  • Guidewire cannot cross target lesion
  • Amputation planned within 30 days
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Flow-limiting dissection (NHLBI grading: D-F) occurred in target lesion by pre-dilation
  • No other lumen-reduction devices (such as: cutting balloon, dual-wire balloon, Hawk, ELCA etc.) are treated before or after test/control group treatment.
  • Before test/control group treatment, target lesion was expanded by Antegrade Dissection Re-entry (ADR) technique.
  • Patient who cannot accept anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  • Aware of patient allergic to heparin, contrast, aspirin and clopidogrel, anesthetics
  • Patients who have not completed clinical trials of other drugs or devices
  • Patients with poor compliance and unable to complete the study, which is identified by investigator.

结局指标

主要结局

Achievement of Optimal PTA in Percent

时间窗: 1 day

Percentage of PTA cases in which \<30% diameter stenosis without a flow limiting dissection (NHLBI grading: D-F). Residual stenosis in percent and dissection NHLBI grading are accessed by independent core-lab with Medis Suite XA based on in-procedure QCA angiography. \[0-100%, higher the better\]

次要结局

  • Device Success Rate in Percent(1 day)
  • Numerical Ankle Brachial Index(0-7days)
  • Freedom from clinical-driven TLR rate in percent(30+/-7 Days post procedure)
  • Rutherford Grading Reduction in percent(30+/-7 Days post procedure)
  • Freedom from Amputation above ankle rate in percent(30+/-7 Days post procedure)
  • Numerical Acute Lumen Gain in mm(1 day)
  • Technical Success Rate in percent(0-7 days)

研究者

发起方
DK Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (14)

Loading locations...

相似试验