Community Dissemination of an Evidence-based Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Intervention
- Conditions
- Colon CancerRectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Educational program and FOBT kits, and technical assistanceBehavioral: Educational program and FOBT kits
- Registration Number
- NCT01351220
- Lead Sponsor
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
Filipino Americans have lower rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, later stage of diagnosis and poorer survival relative to other racial/ethnic groups. To address this disparity, the investigators developed a multi-component intervention to increase CRC screening and have determined its efficacy in a randomized trial (Maxwell,et. al., 2010). This study aims to determine how an intervention to increase CRC screening can best be integrated within the cultural norms and existing structures of churches and community based organizations (CBOs) with predominantly Filipino American membership to ensure broad dissemination to those in need of screening.
The investigators will provide our partner CBOs with resources and technical assistance, including training of community volunteers as health advisors, to enable them to promote CRC screening to their constituents. Using a scientifically rigorous research design, the investigators will compare two dissemination strategies: Basic dissemination which consists of a single kick-off event during which community health advisors will receive print materials and FOBT kits for distribution and training on how to conduct educational small-group sessions; and Organizational dissemination aimed at integrating CRC screening dissemination into organizational practices and processes that can be sustained after the end of the study. The study will be implemented in 20 CBOs and will train 100 community health advisors (CHAs). The impact of the two dissemination strategies will be comprehensively assessed by collecting data at the CBO level, from the CHAs and from 1000 Filipino American participants. The investigators will compare the proportion of Filipino American participants who obtain CRC screening by dissemination strategy, but the investigators will also assess how many are reached, if the intervention is implemented as planned, how CBOs support the screening efforts at their regular activities, and if CBOs and CHAs maintain their efforts over the 4 years of the study.
The investigators hypothesize that CBOs can implement evidence-based strategies to promote CRC screening and CHAs in the organizational dissemination arm will reach more participants and more screened participants than CHAs in the basic dissemination arm; and organizations in the organizational dissemination arm will adopt more CRC screening activities and maintain these better than organizations in the basic dissemination arm.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1100
- Filipino American
- 50 to 75 years of age
- Must not have been diagnosed with CRC
- Must not be adherent to USPSTF CRC screening guidelines
- Not Filipino American
- Younger than 50 or older than 75 years of age
- Have been diagnosed with CRC
- Adherent to USPSTF CRC screening guidelines
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Organizational dissemination Educational program and FOBT kits, and technical assistance - Basic dissemination Educational program and FOBT kits -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in receipt of CRC screening at 6 months and 24 months baseline, 6-month and 24-month post intervention Subjects will receive any one of the 3 recommended CRC screening tests namely, Fecal Occult Blood Test, Flexible sigmoidoscopy or Colonoscopy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in intention to obtain screening at 6 months and 24 months baseline, 6-months and 24-months after exposure to the intervention Change from Baseline in CRC screening knowledge at 6 months and 24 months baseline, 6 months and 24 months after exposure to the educational program Change from Baseline in frequency of patient provider communication at 6 months and 24 months baseline, 6 and 24 months after exposure to the intervention
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UCLA Division of Cancer and Prevention Research
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States