Clinical Trials/CTRI/2016/08/007128

CTRI/2016/08/007128Not yet recruitingPhase 4

comparison of standard insertion technique echnique to insert REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION(LTS-II)with TWO MODIFIED INSERTION TECHNIQUES USING JAW THRUST TECHNIQUE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPY

Not provided1 site in 1 country144 target enrollmentStarted: January 8, 2016Last updated: July 30, 2016

Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase: Phase 4
Status: Not yet recruiting
Enrollment: 144
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: The primary aim of the study will be to compare the success rate of the insertion in two attempts or records it as failure by anesthesia residents

Study Overview Study Design Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Investigators Sites Records & Identifiers Similar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective , randomized trial comparing insertion success rate of three techniques to study the insertion success rate of laryngeal

tube suction -II in 144 poatients

it will be done in department of Anesthesia and ICU Government Medical College , Jammu

. Appropriate sized laryngeal tube suction - II will be inserted.

Primary outcome will to study the success rate of three insertion techniques

Secondary outcome measures will be ease of insertion of device,insertion attempts , insertion time , ease of gastric tube insertion , airway manipulations oropharyngeal seal pressures and complications, if any

Study Design

Study Type: Interventional
Allocation: Computer generated randomization
Masking: Open Label

Eligibility Criteria

Ages: 18.00 Year(s) to 75.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex: All

Inclusion Criteria

•either sex Age 18-75 years ASA Grade I and II,.

Exclusion Criteria

•BMI>35kg/m2 Known airway or esophageal pathology Patients with known or predicted difficult airway Upper Respiratory Tract infection in previous 10days Patients at preoperative increased risk of aspiration Pathological conditions of upper respiratory tract or upper gastrointestinal tract Pregnancy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The primary aim of the study will be to compare the success rate of the insertion in two attempts or records it as failure by anesthesia residents

Time Frame: Starts after the placement of device and confirmation of its successful placement in two attempts insertion in two attempts or records it as failure

Secondary Outcomes

Time to place LTSII in seconds(Number of attempts needed to place)

Investigators

Sponsor

Not provided

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting

Phase 3

aryngeal mask airway insertion techniques in General Anaesthesia

CTRI/2023/09/058139ESIC medical college and Hospital,Faridabad

Not yet recruiting

Phase 4

REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION(LTS-II); STANDARD INSERTION TECHNIQUE VERSUS TWO MODIFIED INSERTION TECHNIQUES USING JAW THRUST TECHNIQUE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPY

CTRI/2016/08/007128I144

Not yet recruiting

Not Applicable

Comparison of three techniques of insertion of i-gel with respect to time of insertion, failure rate.

CTRI/2018/12/016614Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department PGIMS Rohtak135

Not yet recruiting

Phase 4

Comparison of two techniques of LMA insertion in paediatric population (standard and reverse technique)Measurement and Monitoring, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,

CTRI/2023/12/060734Uttar pradesh university of medical sceinces saifai etawah120

Recruiting

Unknown

Comparative evaluation of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal ( a type of airway device ) using different techniques in childrenPaediatric patients aged 3-10 years of either sex, ASA grade I and II, scheduled for surgery of less than 2 hours duration, with LMA ProSeal insertion under General anaesthesia

CTRI/2018/04/013297Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital135