Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% Lidocaine for maxillary Buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. a randomized double- blined clinical trial
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- irreversible pulpitis.
- Registration Number
- IRCT201204302016N5
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research; Kerman University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
The exclusion criteria were the presence of systemic disorders; a sensitivity to articaine 4%with 1:100000 epinephrine and lidocaine2% with 1:80,000 epinephrine; the presence of widening of the periodontal ligament space; the presence of a periapical radiolucency; lactation; pregnancy. Inclusion criteria included healthy patients having a first maxillary molar tooth with irreversible pulpitis and normal periapical radiographic appearance, whit out spontaneously pain that to be needed emergency treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain degree. Timepoint: Befor and after intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Analogous Scale(VAS).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method