MedPath

A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment For Facial Rejuvenation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fine Lines
Wrinkles
Laxity; Skin
Interventions
Other: Gentle Cleanser
Other: Facial Moisturizer
Other: sunscreen SPF 30
Registration Number
NCT06629792
Lead Sponsor
Revision Skincare
Brief Summary

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. Thirty-two (32) healthy female subjects completed the clinical study.

Detailed Description

This single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a topical facial treatment when applied by a license esthetician in clinic in a series of 3 sessions with 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks in healthy women aged 35 to 60 with mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity.

The efficacy and tolerability of the topical facial treatment in improving mild to moderate global facial fine lines, wrinkles, and laxity. was evaluated by Investigator clinical efficacy grading and tolerability grading by a board-certified dermatologist, subject tolerability grading, and clinical photography.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • Having Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - VI
  • Having mid to moderate global face fine lines, wrinkles, and laxtiy (tactile) (score of 3 to 6 according to a modified Griffiths scale).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Currently having or having a history of cold sores (Herpes simplex) on the face.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Topical TreatmentFacial MoisturizerSubjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.
Topical Treatmentsunscreen SPF 30Subjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.
Topical TreatmentGentle CleanserSubjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change Investigator Clinical Efficacy Grading versus Baseline12 weeks

The primary efficacy endpoint will be Investigator Clinical Efficacy grading of parameters at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. the efficacy parameters will be assessed by the expert grader on each subjects global face using a modified Griffiths 10-point scale. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Lack of significant change in Investigator Tolerability Parameters versus Baseline12 weeks

The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by the expert grader by assessing the signs of erythema and dryness using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Lack of significant change in Subjective Tolerability versus Baseline12 weeks

The primary tolerability endpoint will be Subjective Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by subject reporting of the degree of burning, stinging, and itching globally on each subject's global face using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Facial Parameters in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire versus Baseline and Percent Agreement12 weeks

The secondary endpoint will be subject self-assessment questionnaire completed at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). A change in response values at post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline response values indicates an improvement. The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.

Clinical Photography: VISIA-CR and Antera 3D12 weeks

The secondary endpoint will be image analysis of VISIA-CR and Antera 3D clinical photography. VISIA-CR imaging analysis for nasolabial folds, and Antera imaging analysis of roughness and volume on images taken at all timepoints. a reduction in visual fine lines, wrinkles, radiance, and laxity on post-baseline timepoints compared to baseline is indicated an improvement

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SGS Stephens, inc.

🇺🇸

Richardson, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath