跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03344874
NCT03344874已完成不适用

Comparison of Stethee® to the Conventional Stethoscope for Auscultation of Simulated Heart Sounds: A Randomised, Crossover, Non-Inferiority Trial (STELIT)

Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 104 人开始时间: 2018年4月26日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
104
试验地点
2
主要终点
Correctly identified manikin-simulated heart sounds

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to compare the relative capability of Stethee® (new wireless digital stethoscope) and 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ (conventional stethoscope) in the identification of manikin-simulated heart sounds by medical doctors. A randomised, non-blinded, two-period crossover, non-inferiority design will be used to compare the acoustic performance of the two stethoscopes. We aim to determine if Stethee® is as effective as 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ for auscultation of simulated heart sounds, and whether Stethee® could be recommended for use in clinical practice based on a non-inferior comparison with 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™.

详细描述

This is a randomised, non-blinded, two-period crossover, non-inferiority study. Stethee®, a new wireless digital stethoscope, is designed to minimise ambient noise associated with electronic stethoscopes. To date, its acoustic capability in comparison to the conventional stethoscope in the auscultation of heart sounds is not known. Therefore, it is important that Stethee®'s capability as a stethoscope with sound amplification be evaluated alongside the conventional stethoscope prior to its use in the clinical setting. As acoustic performance is the primary endpoint, a non-inferiority design is proposed to enable the comparison of the mutual functionalities of the two stethoscopes. The rationale for a non-inferiority design is that: (a) electronic stethoscopes have shown a marginal benefit over conventional stethoscopes in terms of acoustic performance; (b) electronic stethoscopes have several functional advantages over conventional stethoscopes: the ability to analyse heart sounds and record heart sounds, the availability of a database for storage of heart sounds for remote analysis; and (c) electronic stethoscopes were rated better than conventional stethoscopes in terms of the overall quality of auscultation.

The relative capability of Stethee® is compared to that of 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ by the identification of heart sounds simulated by a manikin, which functions as a surrogate patient. A random sample of non-specialist doctors stratified by health centres in Perak, Malaysia, who meet eligibility criteria and provide written consent to participate, will be randomised to initial testing with Stethee® or 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ to perform cardiac auscultation on a manikin and identify a set of 10 heart sounds. After a 10-minute break, they will repeat the auscultation of the same 10 simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence with the alternate stethoscope. Following the completion of both tests, the doctors will be asked to complete a questionnaire that asks about their preference for either Stethee® or 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ with respect to ease of use, audio clarity, and diagnostic accuracy. At the end of the study, answer sheets and preference questionnaires will be collected for grading and analysis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Non-specialist medical doctors with up to 6 years of working experience post-house officer training
  • Non-specialist medical doctors currently working in the Medical, Paediatric, Anaesthesiology, and Emergency departments of specialist hospitals

排除标准

  • Non-specialist medical doctors who have worked in the Cardiology department for more than 6 months

研究组 & 干预措施

Stethee (new stethoscope)

Experimental

Test 1: Use Stethee® to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds.

Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.

干预措施: Stethee® (Device)

Stethee (new stethoscope)

Experimental

Test 1: Use Stethee® to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds.

Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.

干预措施: 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM (Device)

Littmann (conventional stethoscope)

Active Comparator

Test 1: Use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds.

Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use Stethee® to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.

干预措施: Stethee® (Device)

Littmann (conventional stethoscope)

Active Comparator

Test 1: Use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds.

Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use Stethee® to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.

干预措施: 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Correctly identified manikin-simulated heart sounds

时间窗: Measured immediately after the test

The proportion of correctly identified heart sounds between groups will be compared. The test consist of 10 cardiac conditions (represented by 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds). Subjects (medical doctors) are required to auscultate each heart sound and write the complete answer on the answer sheet. The 'all-or-nothing' marking scheme is used, i.e. answers must exactly match the marking scheme.

次要结局

  • User preference for the two stethoscopes(Measured immediately after the test)
  • Difference in the performance between subgroup of doctors from different clinical settings(Measured immediately after the test)
  • Comparison of the performance of the two stethoscopes in identifying heart sounds of different levels of difficulty(Measured immediately after the test)

研究者

发起方
Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Amanda Wei Yin Lim

Research Pharmacist

Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验