Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN64997093
ISRCTN64997093
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Ambu Aura Once™ and the i-gel™ in elective anaesthetised and ventilated paediatric patients

Inselspital, University Hospital Bern (Switzerland)0 sites240 target enrollmentNovember 11, 2009
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsAirway management in paediatric patientsRespiratory

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Airway management in paediatric patients
Sponsor
Inselspital, University Hospital Bern (Switzerland)
Enrollment
240
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
November 11, 2009
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Inselspital, University Hospital Bern (Switzerland)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Patients of both genders, aged 0\-17 years
  • •2\. Weight of 5\-50 kg
  • •3\. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I\-II
  • •4\. Scheduled at the University Hospital of Bern for elective surgery planned for general anaesthesia not requiring tracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Planned operation time \>4h
  • •2\. Risk of aspiration (non\-fasted, massive gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastrointestinal stenosis or stricture)
  • •3\. Known difficult airway (difficult mask ventilation or difficult laryngoscopy, Cormack\-Lehane grade \>2\)
  • •4\. Congenital malformations involving the respiratory tract
  • •5\. Cervical spine disease
  • •6\. Upper respiratory tract symptoms in the previous 14 days
  • •7\. Preoperative sore throat
  • •8\. Patients with non\-German\-speaking parents or refusing to participate

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study Comparing the vital fluctuations and ease of insertion of two types of Laryngeal Mask AirwayHealth Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: K358- Other and unspecified acute appendicitisHealth Condition 3: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene
CTRI/2024/07/070575Dr Suja R
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing two devices which help the patient breathe under general anaesthesia - the endotracheal tube and the supreme laryngeal mask airway, for patients undergoing gall bladder removal surgery laparoscopically.Health Condition 1: null- Patients with gall stones, for removal of the gall bladder, by laparoscopic surgery.
CTRI/2017/11/010452PD Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre132
Completed
Not Applicable
A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the oropharyngeal airway and facemask to achieve manual ventilation in children as performed by critical care and anaesthetic nursesChildren undergoing ASA I or II surgery or an MRI scanRespiratory
ISRCTN38042170Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)70
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study to compare the two advanced airway devices for airway managementHealth Condition 1: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis
CTRI/2024/03/063711Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Center Moradabad Uttar Pradesh
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative study to see the gastric volume in two airway device groupsHealth Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2022/07/044102AIIMS rishikesh