MedPath

Reduction of Drug Use and HIV Risk Among Out-of-Treatment Methamphetamine Users

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
HIV Infections
Registration Number
NCT01161485
Lead Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Brief Summary

There is a need to identify and test effective strategies to reduce meth use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors in heterosexuals. This project will compare the efficacy of a manually-driven HIV testing and counseling (HIV T/C) intervention, with HIV T/C plus a manualized Contingency Management (CM), with HIV T/C plus CM plus a manualized Strengths-Based Case Management (CM/SBCM) model. As HIV T/C is the standard of care, the investigators are testing to determine if the investigators can enhance this standard. The specific aims and hypotheses of this protocol are:

1. To compare the relative efficacy of HIV T/C vs. CM vs. CM/SBCM on reducing drug use, specifically meth use. Hypothesis 1: CM/SBCM will reduce drug use more than those in CM (which will have more reduction than HIV T/C), potentially mediated through increased service utilization.

2. To compare the relative efficacy of HIV T/C vs. CM vs. CM/SBCM on reducing HIV and STI risk behaviors, specifically sex risk behaviors but also needle risk for injection drug users (IDUs). Hypothesis 2: CM/SBCM will have greater decreases in HIV risk behaviors than those in CM (which will have greater decreases than HIV T/C), potentially mediated through reduced drug use.

3. To compare the relative efficacy of HIV T/C vs. CM vs. CM/SBCM on improving mental health status. Hypothesis 3: CM/SBCM will have greater improvements in mental health status than those in CM (which will have greater improvements than HIV T/C), potentially mediated through increased service utilization and reduction of drug use, and potentially moderated by baseline meth use.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
502
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Be competent (not too intoxicated or mentally disabled) to give informed consent at the time of the interview
  • Meth use (verified through urine drug screening and a self-report of meth use of at least 4 times per month for the last 3 months)
  • Self-reported sex with someone of the opposite sex in last 30 days
  • Ability to provide a reliable address and phone number for contact
  • Not in drug treatment in the past 30 days
  • Willingness to be tested for HIV at baseline and follow-up
  • Not transient and no know reason why he/she will not be available for follow-up interviews
  • Not currently mandated by the criminal justice system to receive treatment based on self-report.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participation in drug treatment in the past 30 days
  • Currently participating in another Project Safe study
  • Pregnant or attempting to become pregnant
  • Intoxicated or impaired mentally to the point that they cannot voluntarily consent to participate tin the project and/or respond to the interview

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reduction of HIV and STI risk behaviors, specifically sex risk behaviors but also needle risk for injection drug users12-month follow-up interview
Improved mental health status12-month follow-up interview
Reduction of drug use, specifically methamphetamine12-month follow-up interview
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Project Safe

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Project Safe
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.