NL-OMON47376CompletedPhase 4
Perceval Sutureless Implant Vs Standard Aortic Valve Replacement - PERSIST-AVR study
Sorin Group Italia S.r.l.0 sites50 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 50
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 to 99 (—)
Inclusion Criteria
- •1. The subject has an indication for treatment by valve replacement with a bioprosthesis according to the IFU, through either full sternotomy or mini-sternotomy.
- •2. The subject has aortic valve disease that can be treated with a commercially available Perceval valve size, based on preoperative CT-scan.
- •3. The subject has:
- •a. critical aortic valve area defined as an initial aortic valve area of *1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index < 0.6 cm2/m2
- •b. Mean gradient > 40mmHg or Vmax > 4m/sec by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization [or with dobutamine stress, if subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <55%] or velocity ratio < 0.25;
- •4. The subject is symptomatic due to aortic stenosis with functional class of NYHA II or higher.
- •5. The subject has signed the informed consent.
- •6. The subject is of legal minimum age.
- •7. The subject will be available for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. The subject has a contraindication for treatment by the Perceval valve or by a bioprosthetic aortic valve as stated in the IFU.
- •2. The subject has aneurismal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
- •3. The subject is scheduled for concomitant procedures other than CABG, myectomy with or without aortic annulus enlargement.
- •4. The subject has congenital bicuspid (i.e. Sievers type 0) or unicuspid aortic valve.
- •5. Anatomical structures not suitable for Perceval valve such as: aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter is > 1.3.
- •6. The subject has a prosthetic heart valve in any position, including mitral valve repair.
- •7. The subject had a stroke or myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI) within 30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
- •8. The subject has active endocarditis, myocarditis, or sepsis.
- •9. The subject is in cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output and needing hemodynamic support.
- •10. The subject is allergic to nickel alloys.
- •11. The subject is already included in another clinical trial that could confound the results of this clinical investigation.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Terminated
Not Applicable
Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic Valve DiseaseAortic StenosisNCT02673697Corcym S.r.l914
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Effects of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation on sympathetic activityaortic valve stenosism aortic valve narrowing10046973NL-OMON37473Academisch Medisch Centrum60
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Effects of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation on Left Ventricular Function And Coronary Hemodynamicsaortic valve narrowingaortic valve stenosis10046973NL-OMON33340Academisch Medisch Centrum120
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial 10 Year Follow-upsevere aortic valve stenosis10046973NL-OMON45149Medtronic B.V.160
Recruiting
Not Applicable
TransCatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Conventional Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary By-Pass Grafts for Treatment of Patients with Coronary MultiVessel Disease and Aortic Valve Stenosismeervatslijdenmultivessel disease and aortic valve stenosis10046973NL-OMON50705Maatschap Cardiologie Zwolle170
