MedPath

Assessment the sExual Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving oncoSexology Supportive Care on Proactive Versus On-request

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Other: Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)
Other: Satisfaction survey
Other: Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology
Registration Number
NCT06415266
Lead Sponsor
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Brief Summary

The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request. The aim is to improve the quality of sexual life of these patients.

Detailed Description

Breast cancer and its treatment are responsible for symptoms that can persist over time and affect quality of life. Given the improved prognosis for breast cancer, more and more patients are faced with the specific problems of the post-cancer period, and caring for them has become a major health issue. Sexual health is a crucial component of well-being and overall quality of life.

The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request.

For that, quality of life questionnaires will be completed by patients at inclusion and every 6 months for 2 years.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
264
Inclusion Criteria
  • Woman or man at least 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of infiltrating breast cancer regardless of the biological characteristics of the tumor
  • Standard treatment by surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, completed a maximum of 3 months ago with the exception of post-neoadjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, immunotherapy, targeted treatment, ...) which must have been started less than 3 months previously
  • Patient with sufficient command of the French language to be able to answer the questionnaires
  • Patient having given informed, written and express consent.
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security System
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and other study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient already taken cared of in oncosexology. The following are not criteria for non-inclusion (a previous single consultation without treatment, use of local vaginal treatments)
  • Metastatic disease
  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactiveQuality of life questionnaire (QLQ)Repeated assessment of the patient's needs in the field of oncosexology. Proposal of a personalized care plan to meet the various needs identified.
Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactiveSatisfaction surveyRepeated assessment of the patient's needs in the field of oncosexology. Proposal of a personalized care plan to meet the various needs identified.
Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactiveAssessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexologyRepeated assessment of the patient's needs in the field of oncosexology. Proposal of a personalized care plan to meet the various needs identified.
Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on requestQuality of life questionnaire (QLQ)One-off distribution of a flyer to the patient containing both general information on sexual health and contact telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for oncosexology help
Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on requestSatisfaction surveyOne-off distribution of a flyer to the patient containing both general information on sexual health and contact telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for oncosexology help
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the quality of sexual life of patients in the intervention arm and patients in the control armat 12 months after the inclusion

EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (SHQ)-C22 specific questionnaire sexual satisfaction scale score.

Questionnaire comprising 2 multi-item scales assessing sexual satisfaction and dyspareunia; as well as 11 single items (including: importance of sexual activity, libido, incontinence, fatigue, impact of treatment on sexual life, communication with professionals, partner); as well as 4 items related to gender: 2 specific items for women (body image, vaginal dryness); 2 specific items for men (body image, confidence in maintaining an erection). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-C30at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion

Scores obtained on the scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials.

The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease.

All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

Assessment of adherence to the programme in the interventional armat inclusion

Percentage of adherence in the interventional arm

Oncosexology programme satisfactionat 24 months before inclusion

Satisfaction score measured on a visual analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10 (10 indicating high satisfaction)

Description of evolution in sexual quality of lifeat inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion

Scores obtained on the EORTC SHQ-C22 questionnaire scales. Questionnaire comprising 2 multi-item scales assessing sexual satisfaction and dyspareunia; as well as 11 single items (including: importance of sexual activity, libido, incontinence, fatigue, impact of treatment on sexual life, communication with professionals, partner); as well as 4 items related to gender: 2 specific items for women (body image, vaginal dryness); 2 specific items for men (body image, confidence in maintaining an erection). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-Breast (BR)cancer module 23 questionnaires.at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion

Scores obtained on the scales of the QLQ-BR23 This EORTC breast cancer specific questionnaire is intended to supplement the QLQ-C30.

The QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items incorporating five multi-item scales to assess systemic therapy side effects, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, body image and sexual functioning. In addition, single items assess sexual enjoyment, hair loss and future perspective. All items are rated on a four-point Likert-type scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For all items but sexual functioning and sexual enjoyment, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factorsat inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion

Coefficients obtained with a model adapted for longitudinal quality of life data scores as a function of covariates potentially associated with sexual and global quality of life.

Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factors -questionnaireat inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion

Anxiety and depression (psychological distress variables) will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire.

The HADS is a 14 items questionnaire: 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression scored on a scale. Scores for items in each subscale of the HADS are summed to produce an anxiety score (HADS-A) or a depression score (HADS-D), or can be added to produce a total score corresponding to emotional distress (HADS-T). Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), for a total score ranging from 0-21 for each subscale. The entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

🇫🇷

Nice, France

CHU de Nîmes

🇫🇷

Nîmes, France

Institut Curie

🇫🇷

Paris, France

IUCT - Oncopole

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

Institut Gustave Roussy

🇫🇷

Villejuif, France

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

🇫🇷

Saint-Herblain, Saint Herblain, France

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

🇫🇷

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Vandoeuvre LES Nancy, France

Centre Léon Bérard

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

ICM Val d'Aurelle

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath