Trial of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Procedure: laparoscopic total mesorectal excisionProcedure: robot-assisted total mesorectal excision
- Registration Number
- NCT02673177
- Lead Sponsor
- Southwest Hospital, China
- Brief Summary
This study compared robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (RTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) with regard to urinary function, sexual function and sphincter- preservation outcomes for low rectal cancer.
- Detailed Description
Urinary and sexual dysfunction are recognized complications of rectal cancer surgery in men. This study compared robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (RTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LTME) with regard to these functional outcomes.Sphincter- preservation outcomes for low rectal cancer was observed as well.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 225
-
- Patients who are acceptable to two surgical procedures for the robot- assisted or laparoscopy-assisted rectal cancer, are willing to randomized trial;
-
- Matching the diagnostic criteria;
-
- Aged 18-70 years old;
-
- Preoperative TNM staging (CT, laparoscopic exploration): cT1-3N0-3M0 (excluding M1, T4);
-
- Preoperative ASA 3 scores;
-
- There was no history of malignancy, no other malignant tumors by preoperative examination;
-
- Without undergoing definitive treatment, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy preoperatively;
-
- The informed consent form was signed by the patient himself(herself)or his principal agent;
-
- In accordance with the international erectile function questionnaire (IIEF) urinary function scale, The urinary sexual function are normal.
-
- Age less than 18 years old or more than 70 years old;
-
- Previous psychiatric patients or patients refused to sign the informed consent;
-
- Attending other related clinical studies on surgical treatment of rectal cancer;
-
- The patient has a history of malignant tumor, or a combination of other malignant tumors;
-
- Patients have been treated with definitive treatment: radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy;
-
- Patients had received otherper abdominal operations (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy);
-
- ASA >3;
-
- Laparoscopic surgical contraindications: such as severe heart lung disease; abdominal wall hernia; diaphragmatic hernia; coagulation disorder; portal hypertension; pregnancy, etc.;
-
- Those who has been confirmed to be unable to do a radical resection (T4 stage) for local advanced tumor;
-
- Those who have urination sexual dysfunction preoperatively.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision laparoscopic total mesorectal excision Traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) for rectal cancer was performed. The Urinary, sexual function and sphincter- preservation outcomes were evaluated. Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision robot-assisted total mesorectal excision Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (RTME) for rectal cancer. Two different RTME procedures were chose to personalized patients. Generally, when the tumor located within 5-15cm from the anal verge, low anterior resection (LAR) was employed, and tumor located below 5cm, abdominoperineal resection (APR) was applied usually.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of sexual and urinary dysfunction One years after surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method disease-free survival(DFS ) 3 years disease-free survival DFS was defined as from the date of randomization to the date of tumor recurrence or death from any cause
Anus preservation rate One years after surgery