MedPath

Peer Engagement in Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction With Contingency Management (PEER-CM)

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Methamphetamine Abuse
Interventions
Behavioral: Peer Contingency Management
Behavioral: Standard of Care Contingency Management
Registration Number
NCT05700994
Lead Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Brief Summary

The main goal of this study is to tests the effect of incentivizing achievement of self-identified, personal harm reduction goals (Contingency management or CM) compared with standard of care (peer harm reduction service with incentives for peer visits) to increase the reach and effectiveness of methamphetamine (MA) harm reduction services.

Detailed Description

Using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation framework and stepped-wedge design, this study will randomize eighteen community-based peer harm reduction sites to provide contingency management incentives for achieving self-identified harm reduction goals set with peer specialists using a participant-driven harm reduction goal-setting process (e.g. completing overdose prevention and supply training, daily life goals, treatment and care goals, relationship and social support goals) versus standard of care contingency management (i.e. incentives for peer encounter attendance).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1800
Inclusion Criteria

This intervention is at the site level. Community-based organization sites are eligible if they:

  • Use peer support specialists to provide direct outreach and harm reduction services to people who use drugs
  • Are willing to be trained in the two strategies for peer-facilitated contingency management

Clients who:

  • Age 18 and older
  • Any stimulant (methamphetamine, cocaine) use in the past 30 days
  • Willing to accept peer services
  • Willing to complete initial and follow-up assessments with peer
  • Able to communicate in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria

Community-based organization sites who:

  • Do not use peer support specialists to provide direct outreach and harm reduction services to people who use drugs
  • Are not willing to be trained in the two strategies for peer-facilitated contingency management

Clients who:

• Present any danger or threat of violence to peers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PEER-CMPeer Contingency ManagementPeer-facilitated contingency management (PEER-CM).
Standard of CareStandard of Care Contingency ManagementStandard of care contingency management.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of participants who engage in substance use disorder treatment6 months from baseline

Determine whether incentives for achieving self-identified, personal harm reduction goals increases engagement with treatment services at 6 months from enrollment identified through completed assessment.

Number of participants who overdose6 months from baseline

Test the impact of incentives for achieving self-identified, personal harm reduction goals on the likelihood of overdose among people using methamphetamine at 6 months from enrollment identified through completed assessment.

Number of participants who achieve self-identified goals6 months from baseline

Determine whether incentives for achieving self-identified, personal harm reduction goals increases engagement with harm reduction services at 6 months from enrollment identified through completed assessment.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Comagine Health

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

Oregon Health & Science University

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath