A Patient-centered Continuous and Interdisciplinary Shared Decision Making Approach for Breast Cancer Rehabilitation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Shared Decision Making
- Sponsor
- Taipei Medical University
- Enrollment
- 264
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Control Preference Scale
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Background: Breast cancer rehabilitation has gradually expanded from post-surgery rehabilitation to continuous rehabilitation including prehabilitation between cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment, post-surgery rehabilitation, and return-to-work/return-home interventions. Continuous rehabilitation provides patients with tailored training at each treatment period, in order to maintain patients' functions or accelerate the recovery of functions, reduce the burden of symptoms, and improve patients' independence and quality of life. As the functional rehabilitation needs and lifestyle adjustment needs of each patient's life role are different, only with an interprofessional rehabilitation team, patients can obtain patient-centered and comprehensive rehabilitation interventions. Interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) is an decision-making process that interprofessional team and patients discussion the treatment options, based on the best evidence and patient values and preferences, to make a patient-centered treatment decision. However, the major barriers of the implementation of IP-SDM are the lack of IP-SDM skills of clinicians and the lack of medical knowledge of patients.
Purposes: The project aims (1) to develop a patient-centered continuous and interdisciplinary shared decision making approach for breast cancer rehabilitation, including IP-SDM training for interprofessional rehabilitation team, as well as decision coaching, patient decision aid and question prompt list for patients; and (2) to examine the effects of IP-SDM approach on the IP-SDM self-efficacy of interprofessional rehabilitation team and patients, quality of IP-SDM process, patients' satisfaction with decision, concordance between preferences and the chosen options, patients' upper limb function and health-related quality of life.
Detailed Description
Methods: This 3-year prospective project will be divided into four phases: (1) Exploration of the IP-SDM needs of continuous breast cancer rehabilitation: We will interview breast cancer patients and consult breast cancer care professionals with different disciplines to understand the IP-SDM needs of breast cancer rehabilitation in each treatment period. (2) Development of communication and decision aids: An expert panel will develop a mobile application prototype of communication and decision aids. The prototype will be testes for the understandability and applicability by breast cancer patients. (3) Development of decision coaching and IP-SDM training programs: We will consult experts to develop a decision coaching training program for breast cancer patients and an IP-SDM training program for interprofessional rehabilitation team. (4) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the patient-centered continuous and interdisciplinary shared decision making approach for breast cancer rehabilitation: We will conduct a parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial and recruit 116 breast cancer patients at Taipei Medical University Hospital to evaluate the effectiveness of the IP-SDM approach. Expected results and impacts: We expect that the patient-centered continuous and interdisciplinary shared decision making approach for breast cancer rehabilitation will effectively improve patients' IP-SDM self-efficacy, quality of IP-SDM process, patients' satisfaction with decision, concordance between preferences and the chosen options, patients' upper limb function and health-related quality of life. In the future, this IP-SDM approach will be promising to be applied to other medical institutions and other cancer populations, so as to enhance patient-centered, interprofessional and continuous practice in cancer care.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •diagnosis of Breast cancer ICD-10 codes C50、C79.2、C79.81、D05.00-D05.92、D48.60-D48.62、Z51.0、Z51.11; ICD-9 codes 174.0\~174.9、198.2、198.81、233.0、238.3、V58.0、V58.1)
- •Age\>20 years
- •Ability to follow instructions and complete the interviews
- •Agree to record the doctor-patient communication process
Exclusion Criteria
- •Diagnoses mental problems
- •Patient with Cancer terminal stage and weakness
- •Cancer has brain metastases or other major diseases (such as dementia) that may affect cognitive function.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Control Preference Scale
Time Frame: After intervention immediately
Control Preference Scale (CPS) is to measure the patients' preferred role whether change in making decisions with the medical provider before intervention and after intervention. It consists of five cards, each of which presents a different character in medical decision-making in a cartoon pattern, and performs a series of comparisons to rank the preference.
Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire
Time Frame: After intervention immediately
Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire (PEPPI) is to measure patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians. It has 10 items and higher scores means self-efficacy performance.
Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale
Time Frame: After intervention immediately
Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) is to measure three relatively distinct factors: (1) doctor facilitation of patient involvement, (2) level of information exchange, and (3) patient participation in decision making. It has 13 items.
Decision Self Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: After intervention immediately
Decision Self Efficacy Scale (DSES) is to measure patients' self-confidence and belief in measuring the ability of patients to participate in decision-making. It has 11 items with 5 level Likert scale. The scale range is 0-100 and higher scores indicate better decision self-efficacy.
Secondary Outcomes
- SURE test(After intervention immediately)
- collaboRATE(After intervention immediately)
- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(After intervention immediately)
- modified brief version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire(After intervention immediately)