Comparison of Skeletal Effects of Herbst and Invisalign MA in Growing Patients With KLass II Malocclusion

Phase 1

Recruiting

• Conditions: Mandibular Growth Stimulation
• Interventions: Device: Stimulation of mandibular growth.

• Registration Number: NCT06409923
• Lead Sponsor: Université Libre de Bruxelles

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine and compare the precise skeletal dental and soft tissue effect of Mandibular advancement aligners and Herbst Appliance.

Detailed Description

Precise description of study methodology.

For each group, a sample of +- 15 patients with class 2 malocclusion aged between 9 and 15 years will be collected for this prospective study who presented for an initial orthodontic consultation between October 2022 and july 20262 at ULB's Erasme Hospital. Each patient will be treated with Invisalign MA or the Herbst appliance by residents of the orthodontic program directed by P. Maria Orellana

Inclusion criteria included a Class II skeletal malocclusion with an ANB greater than 4°; (In the case of a Class 2 Division 2 malocclusion, the retroclined upper incisors will be proclined to obtain an overjet allowing mandibular advancement. If the patient has a transverse deficit, palatal expansion will be performed before treatment with aligners and during treatment in herbst cases.) Class II molar and canine relationship and CVM2/CVM3 cervical vertebral maturation.

Informed consent forms in the patient's native language will be submitted before the start of each treatment.

Only a profile cephalometry will be taken in the patients considered for this study at the time of the initial consultation.

This will avoid unnecessary radiographic exposure, and a panoramic view of each patient will be extracted from a CBCT using the FDA-approved BlueskyBio program.

Aligners or Herbst appliance for orthodontic treatment will be fabricated on the basis of a 3D optical scan (Itero), after which patients will begin treatment.

Levelling of the Spee curve, derotation of (pre)molars and palatal incisors in the case of class 2 division 2 malocclusion will be carried out before the mandibular advancement stage if necessary in the Aligner group.

A full-face ultra-low dose CBCT scan will be performed on all included subjects before the mandibular advancement stage according to a strict protocol by a certified physician. Active mandibular advancement will be continued till a KLass I molar relationship is obtained and will be followed by 2 months without mandibular advancement to allow the mandibular condyles to take a central position in the condylar fossae. After this 2-month period, a second CBCT scan will be performed (T2), with a minimal time interval of one year between the two CBCT scans, using the same protocol.

CBCTs will be acquired using a Promax Mid 90 Kv with settings of 90 kV and 8.9 mAS, and tube current modulation will be used to enable patient-specific dose reduction.

After the second CBCT, orthodontic treatment will be continued until completion, and retention and regular post-treatment follow-up will be scheduled for each patient.

The superposition of CBCT (T1) and (T2) images on the anterior cranial base will be used to determine exact mandibular lengthening, condylar displacement, mandibular rotation and chin displacement using the following methodology described and developed by Hugo. De Clerck in 2009.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-02-14
• Study First Submitted: 2024-04-09
• Status Verified: 2024-05
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-05-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-05-07
• Study First Posted: 2024-05-10
• Last Update Posted: 2024-05-10
• Primary Completion: 2027-09-10
• Study Completion: 2027-09-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

• CVM> 4
• periodontal disease

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Invisalign MA- group (mandibular advancement)	Stimulation of mandibular growth.	Patients treated by MA aligner system of invisalign
Herbst group	Stimulation of mandibular growth.	Patient treated with the herbst appliance

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mandibular lenghtening	Difference between T1/T2. T1: Before Mandibular advancement phase, T2: Minimum 1 year after T1 and 2 months without mandibular advancement.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Université LIbre de Bruxelles; 🇧🇪 Anderlecht, Belgium

UNiversité Libre de Bruxelles; 🇧🇪 Brussels, Belgium