Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05069922
NCT05069922CompletedNot Applicable

Randomized Trial of Fresh Frozen Plasma Versus Albumin in Acute Burn Resuscitation

University of Colorado, Denver1 site in 1 country59 target enrollmentStarted: February 17, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
59
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Total volume of fluid administered in 24 hours in each group (FFP or albumin), measured as mL/kg/%TBSA burned.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators propose a prospective randomized trial to study fresh frozen plasma (FFP) versus albumin to determine the optimal colloid in burn resuscitations. This work addresses both FY20 focus areas, prolonged field care (PFC) and en route care, along with mitigating secondary effects of acute intervention, such as prevention of over resuscitation. Future military conflicts anticipate more extensive burn and blast injuries, and delayed evacuation. Therefore, the direct comparison of colloids used in burn resuscitation is critical to advancing battlefield medicine. Specifically, this work will provide the foundation for the use of freeze-dried plasma (FDP) in burn care by medical responders in PFC and en route care scenarios. The investigators hypothesize that FFP administration, and later FDP, in burn resuscitation is as safe as albumin, and more efficacious, in both reducing the total volume of fluid required in acute burn resuscitation and correcting burn endotheliopathy.

Detailed Description

Specific Aim 1: The investigators will evaluate the total fluids administered in FFP (intervention) and albumin (control) groups. The investigators propose that the FFP group will require less total fluids administered.

Specific Aim 2:The investigators will determine overall complication rates (pulmonary complications, ARDS, ACS, over-resuscitation) in the FFP (intervention) and albumin (control) administration groups. The investigators propose FFP administration will reduce the frequency of these complications.

Specific Aim 3: The investigators will characterize the effects of FFP and albumin administration on endothelial dysfunction in major burns. We will measure glycocalyx degradation products (e.g. syndecan-1, glycosaminoglycans) in the serum. The investigators project FFP will mitigate GDP better than albumin.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •adult thermal injury patients aged 2:18 years old with burns ->20% TBSA seen at UCH Burn Center within 8 hours of burn injury

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Pregnant patients, prisoners, Jehovah's Witness/inability to receive human blood product/component therapy, electrical injury, chemical injury, friction/shear injury, anticipated death within 48 hours of admission, delayed intervention (>8 hours post burn), history of renal failure requiring dialysis, Stage IV or V chronic kidney disease, coagulopathy (admission INR >2.5), cirrhosis (Childs B,C), concomitant life threatening traumatic injuries, receiving blood product transfusion for another reason, inability to obtain consent from patient or legally authorized representative.

Arms & Interventions

Fresh Frozen Plasma

Active Comparator

At 6-8 hours, Initiate FFP infusion

Intervention: Fresh Frozen Plasma (Other)

Albumin

Active Comparator

At 7 hours, Initiate 5% Albumin infusion

Intervention: Fresh Frozen Plasma (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total volume of fluid administered in 24 hours in each group (FFP or albumin), measured as mL/kg/%TBSA burned.

Time Frame: 3 years

Total volume

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials