Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02346201
NCT02346201CompletedPhase 3

Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health10 sites in 2 countries200 target enrollmentStarted: January 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
200
Locations
10
Primary Endpoint
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) is a Phase III, placebo-controlled, masked, 6 month, multi-center randomized clinical trial sponsored by National Institutes of Aging involving 200 participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD). ADMET 2 is designed to examine the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate as treatment for clinically significant apathy in AD participants. ADMET 2 will enroll participants from real world settings such as outpatient, nursing home, and assisted living facilities and will examine the effects of methylphenidate on apathy and cognition. ADMET 2 will also conduct careful safety monitoring.

Detailed Description

ADMET 2 will examine in a masked, randomized trial the efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of clinically significant apathy in participants with Alzheimer's dementia. Efficacy will be assessed as the change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Apathy subscale (NPI apathy) from baseline to 6 months and score on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scale at 6 months.

ADMET 2 will also examine the safety of methylphenidate for the treatment of clinically significant apathy in participants with Alzheimer's disease by measuring vital signs, electrolyte panels, adverse event reports, and electrocardiograms. Safety will also be measured by examining neuropsychiatric symptoms other than apathy using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

Changes from baseline to 6 months in other neuropsychological assessments as measured using the Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating (DAIR) scale will also be assessed.

Cost-effectiveness will be measured by assessing quality of life and economic assessment and cognitive changes using a cognitive battery that includes the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and other scales.

A biomarker sub-study initiated part-way through the main trial will collect information on blood-based biomarkers, including microRNA, markers of oxidative stress, inflammation, neuronal loss and lipidomics.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Methylphenidate

Active Comparator

Methylphenidate, target dose 20 mg per day (range 10-20 mg per day), in 5 mg over-capsulated tablets, and psychosocial intervention

Intervention: Methylphenidate (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Matching over-encapsulated placebo and psychosocial intervention

Intervention: Placebo (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

Time Frame: baseline to 6 months

Mean difference in change from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy subscale scores as administered by certified personnel to the study caregiver. SEVERITY is graded 1 to 3 and FREQUENCY is graded 1 to 4. The overall score for the domain is the product of the severity and frequency which ranges from 1 to 12 with higher scores indicating more apathy.

Percentage of Participants With Change in Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

Time Frame: Baseline to month 6

Percentage of individuals improving on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) from baseline to 6 months; the CGIC is a 7-point Likert scale used to rate each patient with the following scores: "marked worsening"(7), "moderate worsening" (6), "minimal worsening"(5), "no change"(4), "minimal improvement"(3), "moderate improvement"(2), "marked improvement"(1). Ratings were based on an interview with the caregiver and an examination of the patient. The CGIC requires the clinician to consider a number of aspects of apathy, such as level of initiative, level of interest, and emotional engagement. Reported data is the percentage of participants with minimal/moderate/marked improvement.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (10)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials