Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06406686
NCT06406686Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Ablation Index in Standard vs. High Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: A Randomized Study (AITAF)

University of Calgary1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: June 3, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
RF time to durable CTI block

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Ablation Index-guided high power - short duration (HPSD) ablation compared to conventional power settings in Cavotricuspid Isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter. Participants will be randomized to receive either AI-guided HPSD ablation at 50 Watts or conventional power settings at 30 Watts. Both arms will use the Carto 3D mapping system and the QDOT MICRO ablation catheter (Biosense Webster). An anatomically contiguous line will be created with <6mm inter-lesion distance. After a standardized wait time of 30 minutes, ablation success will be assessed. The primary outcome is total radiofrequency ablation time. Secondary outcomes include procedural time, fluoroscopy time, safety outcomes, and 3-month freedom from recurrence. It is our expectation that HPSD will result in a shorter primary outcome.

Detailed Description

Title: A Randomized Trial of Ablation Index Guided High vs Standard Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter

Design: Prospective, two-arm, single center, superiority study with comparison of standard 30W power settings vs 50W high power settings

Purpose: To evaluate the superiority of high-power ablation settings over standard power settings in achieving block across the CTI for typical flutter

Enrollment: A minimum of 25 subjects in each arm. Enrollment over a period of 12 months.

Subjects: Subjects referred by a cardiac electrophysiologist for standalone radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Single-blinded. Investigator will know study arm, patients/participants will not. The outcomes assessor will be blinded.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Clinically determined by a cardiac electrophysiologist to have had at least one episode of CTI dependent atrial flutter
  • •Clinically determined by a cardiac electrophysiologist likely to benefit from standalone CTI ablation
  • •For this to be their first CTI ablation attempt
  • •Able and willing to comply with all protocol requirements
  • •Agree to and sign patient Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • •Be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Previous CTI ablation
  • •Adult congenital heart disease, including Ebstein's anomaly
  • •Previous surgery involving the tricuspid valve and atrium including cannulation scars for cardiopulmonary bypass
  • •Pediatric population age <18
  • •Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • •Active enrollment in another investigational study involving a drug or device.
  • •A requirement for additional procedures in the same setting. Such as EP study and ablation of other induced arrhythmias since these prolong secondary endpoints such as procedure time and RF time
  • •Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) such as flecainide, sotalol, or amiodarone should have their AAD stopped 3 days prior, and not be restarted after the procedure
  • •Patients under General Anesthetic (GA)
  • •Patients with sufficient baseline cognitive impairment to be unable to answer a post-procedure survey or consent Previous ablations, other than for CTI flutter, are acceptable.

Arms & Interventions

30 Watt

Active Comparator

Power set to 30 Watts

Intervention: Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter (Procedure)

50 Watt

Experimental

Power set to 50 Watts

Intervention: Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

RF time to durable CTI block

Time Frame: End of procedure

Cumulative delivery time of radio-frequency lesions

Secondary Outcomes

  • Total procedure time(End of procedure)
  • Incidence of early re-connections during wait period(End of procedure)
  • Steam pops(End of procedure)
  • Post-procedure patient perception of pain and nausea(End of procedure day)
  • Pericardial effusions(End of procedure day)
  • Total analgesia and sedation usage(End of procedure)
  • RF time to initial CTI block(End of procedure)
  • Total number of ablation lesions required to achieve durable CTI block(End of procedure)
  • Pericardial tamponade(End of procedure day)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rory Dowd

EP fellow

University of Calgary

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials